At 08/15/2012 04:53 AM, Marcelo Tosatti Wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Ya
On Aug 15, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering?
>>
>> I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to
>> engineer something that works w
On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>>>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, J
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering?
>
> I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to
> engineer something that works with Windows seems odd, no?
>
Yan says in other email tha
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:59:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> >> Marcelo Tosatti wr
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> >> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer w
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Aug 14,
On 14 August 2012 19:53, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Forget about !x86 platforms. They have their own way to do this sort of
> thing. Think of this feature like a status LED on a motherboard. These
> are very common and usually controlled by IO ports.
Please don't forget !x86 platforms, we are cu
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On 2012-08-14 10:56, Daniel P.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:53:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> >>
> >> On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 2012-08-14 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Au
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:55:54PM +0300, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>> > On 2012-08-14 10:56, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:21:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Aug 08, 201
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:29:38PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:47:48AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:24:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > > On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Mar
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:47:48AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:24:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:24:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > >> We can know the guest is panicked when the gue
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:48:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
> >> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
> >>
> >> An
On 08/13/2012 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:43:01AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
>> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>>
>> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
>> libvirt
16 matches
Mail list logo