Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 12:01 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > * Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > Are you objecting only to the duplication at the callsites, so that an
> > > > fsnotify-t
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 12:01 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > * Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Are you objecting only to the duplication at the callsites, so that an
> > > fsnotify-type of consolidation of security and integrity hooks wo
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 21:16 +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This patch places calls to the new integrity hooks in the appropriate
> > places in the fs directory. It is not meant in any way to be viewed
> > as a complete set, but used as a basis for an
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 09:40 -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Are you objecting only to the duplication at the callsites, so that an
> > fsnotify-type of consolidation of security and integrity hooks would be
> > ok? Or are you complaining that the secur
Mimi Zohar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch places calls to the new integrity hooks in the appropriate
> places in the fs directory. It is not meant in any way to be viewed
> as a complete set, but used as a basis for an initial discussion.
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm2/fs/ext3/xattr_sec
Quoting Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Are you objecting only to the duplication at the callsites, so that an
> > fsnotify-type of consolidation of security and integrity hooks would be
> > ok? Or are you complaining that the security_inode_set
* Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Are you objecting only to the duplication at the callsites, so that an
> fsnotify-type of consolidation of security and integrity hooks would be
> ok? Or are you complaining that the security_inode_setxattr and
> integrity_inode_setxattr hooks are too
Quoting Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Mimi Zohar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > + integrity_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
> > security_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
>
> > + integrity_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
> > security_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
>
> >
* Mimi Zohar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> + integrity_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
> security_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
> + integrity_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
> security_d_instantiate(entry, inode);
> spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> +
This patch places calls to the new integrity hooks in the appropriate
places in the fs directory. It is not meant in any way to be viewed
as a complete set, but used as a basis for an initial discussion.
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm2/fs/ext3/xattr_security.c
=
10 matches
Mail list logo
