Le Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:29:58 +0100,
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> no strong feelings if the ACPI guys ack it - but i suspect the
> renaming of the function from acpi_parse_sbf to sbf_acpi_parse was
> unnecessary?
I rename acpi_parse_sbf() to sbf_acpi_parse() because the function was
* Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BOOT, acpi_parse_sbf);
> + acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BOOT, sbf_acpi_parse);
no strong feelings if the ACPI guys ack it - but i suspect the renaming
of the function from acpi_parse_sbf to sbf_acpi_parse was unnec
Hi,
The Simple Boot Flag specification support (in
arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c) is not really needed on embedded platforms,
so it can probably be compiled out. Zwane Mwaikambo did a patch a few
months (years ?) ago to configure out the compilation of that file, and
I've updated the patch to recent
3 matches
Mail list logo
