Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators

2012-10-14 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 10/14/2012 01:13 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: I think the sub-node style above it nicer because it allows referencing the individual clocks outputs with a phandle. We use this chip to generate base-frequencies for audio clocks, and so we have to switch between two freqs for the multiples of 22.5KHz

Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators

2012-10-14 Thread Daniel Mack
Hi, On 14.10.2012 12:59, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > Adding LAKML and devtree as there might be people willing to comment about > DT representation of i2c-attached clock generators, too. > > On 10/12/2012 08:17 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: >> On 11.10.2012 18:00, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >> [

Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators

2012-10-14 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
Adding LAKML and devtree as there might be people willing to comment about DT representation of i2c-attached clock generators, too. On 10/12/2012 08:17 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: On 11.10.2012 18:00, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> [...] Does any of you work rely on a working si5351 driver? Yes,

Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators

2012-10-12 Thread Daniel Mack
On 11.10.2012 18:00, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 10/11/2012 10:34 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> I recently read about the newly introduced common clock framework (ccf) >>> and wondered if this could be also used for external, e.g. i2c attached, >>> clock generators. >>> >>> Based on my current u

Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators

2012-10-11 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 10/11/2012 10:34 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: I recently read about the newly introduced common clock framework (ccf) and wondered if this could be also used for external, e.g. i2c attached, clock generators. Based on my current understanding of the framework I wrote such a driver and now I want to

Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators

2012-10-11 Thread Daniel Mack
Hi Sebastian, On 10.05.2012 03:11, Sebastian Hesselbarh wrote: > first of all I apologize for the quite long attachment but I think > it is useful for the following discussion. > > I recently read about the newly introduced common clock framework (ccf) > and wondered if this could be also used fo