Hi Christoph,
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:26:09PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > I guess it would improve system performance very well.
> > But as I wrote down in description, downside of the patch is that we have to
> > age anon lru although we don
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
> I guess it would improve system performance very well.
> But as I wrote down in description, downside of the patch is that we have to
> age anon lru although we don't have swap. But gain via the patch is bigger
> than
> loss via aging of anon lru when mem
Hi Christoph,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:19:27PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > #endif
> > + /*
> > +* True if page in this vma is reclaimed.
>
> What does that mean? All pages in the vma have been cleared out?
It means at least, more than
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
> #endif
> + /*
> + * True if page in this vma is reclaimed.
What does that mean? All pages in the vma have been cleared out?
> + TTU_IGNORE_VOLATILE = (1 << 11),/* ignore volatile */
> };
> #define TTU_ACTION(x) ((x) & TTU_ACTION_MASK)
>
>
This patch introudce new madvise behavior MADV_VOLATILE and
MADV_NOVOLATILE for anonymous pages. It's different with
John Stultz's version which considers only tmpfs. This patch
cannot cover John's one so if below idea is proved as reasonable
maybe, we can unify both concepts and I hope interface c
5 matches
Mail list logo