On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:53:39AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:57:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:49:26AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > However, how would it distinguish things like flushing another work
> > >
> > > I think it m
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:57:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:49:26AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > However, how would it distinguish things like flushing another work
> >
> > I think it must be distinguished with what it actually waits for, e.i.
> > completion
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:49:26AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > However, how would it distinguish things like flushing another work
>
> I think it must be distinguished with what it actually waits for, e.i.
> completion
> variables instead of work or wq. I will make it next week and let you kn
yes, I want to resend after working it more carefully.
> >
> > Could you let me know your opinions about this?
> >
> > ->8-
> > From 448360c343477fff63df766544eec4620657a59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Byungchul Park
> > Date: Fri, 25 A
yes, I want to resend after working it more carefully.
> >
> > Could you let me know your opinions about this?
> >
> > ->8-
> > From 448360c343477fff63df766544eec4620657a59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Byungchul Park
> > Date: Fri, 25 A
nt to resend after working it more carefully.
>>
>> Could you let me know your opinions about this?
>>
>> ->8-
>> From 448360c343477fff63df766544eec4620657a59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Byungchul Park
>> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:35:07 +
ions about this?
>
> ->8-
> From 448360c343477fff63df766544eec4620657a59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:35:07 +0900
> Subject: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks
>
> We intro
nt to resend after working it more carefully.
>>
>> Could you let me know your opinions about this?
>>
>> ->8-
>> From 448360c343477fff63df766544eec4620657a59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Byungchul Park
>> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:35:07 +0900
>&g
ions about this?
>
> ->8-
> From 448360c343477fff63df766544eec4620657a59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:35:07 +0900
> Subject: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks
>
> We intro
r opinions about this?
+cc o...@redhat.com
+cc da...@fromorbit.com
> ->8-
> >From 448360c343477fff63df766544eec4620657a59e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:35:07 +0900
> Subject: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect
0 2001
From: Byungchul Park
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:35:07 +0900
Subject: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks
We introduced the following commit to detect deadlocks caused by
wait_for_completion() in flush_{workqueue, work}() and other locks. But
now LOCKDEP_COM
11 matches
Mail list logo
