On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:17:20PM +0200, Nikolaus Voss wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
[...]
> >+1 on NACK for this and anything else that abuse PRP0001 as a short cut
> >approach.
>
> This is no abuse but exactly what PRP0001 is meant for. The basic idea of
> PRP0001 is to
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Nikolaus Voss
wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
wrote:
+1 on NACK for this and anything else that abuse PRP0001
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Nikolaus Voss
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
wrote:
>
>>> +1 on NACK for this and
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Nikolaus Voss
wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
>>> wrote:
>> +1 on NACK for this and anything else that abuse PRP0001 as a short cut
>> approach.
> This
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
wrote:
Hi Sudeep, Andy,
Yes, This patch is to get of_device_id and then fetch data pointer.
To add ACPI support in multiple drivers which are device-tree based
and
Hi Sudeep, Andy,
Thank you for all the valuable information and knowledge.
Regards,
Srinath.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Sudeep, Andy,
>>>
>>> Yes, This pa
On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
> wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep, Andy,
>>
>> Yes, This patch is to get of_device_id and then fetch data pointer.
>>
>> To add ACPI support in multiple drivers which are device-tree based
>> and has list of of_devic
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam
wrote:
> Hi Sudeep, Andy,
>
> Yes, This patch is to get of_device_id and then fetch data pointer.
>
> To add ACPI support in multiple drivers which are device-tree based
> and has list of of_device_ids, by using this function
> very minimal changes an
Hi Sudeep, Andy,
Yes, This patch is to get of_device_id and then fetch data pointer.
To add ACPI support in multiple drivers which are device-tree based
and has list of of_device_ids, by using this function
very minimal changes and can avoid acpi_device_id list in the driver.
I will send driver c
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Srinath Mannam
wrote:
> This patch provides a function, to get of_device_id after
> matching with ACPI device _DSD object compatible property
> in the case driver does not contain acpi_device_id list
> and driver probe called for ACPI device ID PRP0001 with
> compa
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 02:52:40PM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> This patch provides a function, to get of_device_id after
> matching with ACPI device _DSD object compatible property
> in the case driver does not contain acpi_device_id list
> and driver probe called for ACPI device ID PRP0001 with
This patch provides a function, to get of_device_id after
matching with ACPI device _DSD object compatible property
in the case driver does not contain acpi_device_id list
and driver probe called for ACPI device ID PRP0001 with
compatible property match with of_device_id compatible.
Signed-off-by:
12 matches
Mail list logo
