On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:09:03PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> The question here is. This driver is just reporting problem through
> edac interface which is counting that errors and provide an unified
> way how to report problems.
Yes, normally you can use edac for reporting and error counting. B
Hi Borislav,
>> My question is if using printk in IRQ handler and report problem is
>> equal to reporting this via edac interface. Or it is just easy way
>> to do but using edac interface is right solution and how to do it
>> properly is different question.
>
> Yeah, it would probably be easier i
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:12:17AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> I am just curious about this recommendation. Does it mean that we
> shouldn't use edac interface just for reporting problems?
Yes, we should. But, if you want to have two different drivers accessing
the hardware and have to build sync
On 04/09/2014 07:47 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:59:49PM +0530, Punnaiah Choudary wrote:
>> There is a driver file cache-l2x0.c under arch/arm/mm for pl310 cache
>> configuration and management. Russel king had suggested to use
>> single driver file for both pl310 edac im
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:59:49PM +0530, Punnaiah Choudary wrote:
> There is a driver file cache-l2x0.c under arch/arm/mm for pl310 cache
> configuration and management. Russel king had suggested to use
> single driver file for both pl310 edac implementation and cache-l2x0.c
> Here is the thread
>
There is a driver file cache-l2x0.c under arch/arm/mm for pl310 cache
configuration and management. Russel king had suggested to use
single driver file for both pl310 edac implementation and cache-l2x0.c
Here is the thread
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg320407.html
please provide your
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:18:28AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> I don't think so, the PL310 is present on lots of ARM chips besides
> Xilinx. I don't know how many support parity as that is optional. In
> fact the highbank_l2_edac.c is for the PL310 as well, but the
> registers it uses is all custom
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 08:02:40PM +0530, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
>> Add support for ARM Pl310 L2 cache controller parity error
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/edac/pl310_edac_l2.tx
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 08:02:40PM +0530, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
> Add support for ARM Pl310 L2 cache controller parity error
>
> Signed-off-by: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/edac/pl310_edac_l2.txt | 19 ++
> drivers/edac/Kconfig
On 04/03/2014 05:24 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:02:30PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Any comment about this driver?
>
> It is all on the TODO list. I'll take a look after the merge window
> closes.
Ok. Thank you,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> Key
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:02:30PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Any comment about this driver?
It is all on the TODO list. I'll take a look after the merge window
closes.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from thi
Hi Borislav,
On 03/02/2014 03:32 PM, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
> Add support for ARM Pl310 L2 cache controller parity error
>
> Signed-off-by: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/edac/pl310_edac_l2.txt | 19 ++
> drivers/edac/Kconfig
Add support for ARM Pl310 L2 cache controller parity error
Signed-off-by: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
---
.../devicetree/bindings/edac/pl310_edac_l2.txt | 19 ++
drivers/edac/Kconfig |7 +
drivers/edac/Makefile |1 +
drivers/
13 matches
Mail list logo
