On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Jordi Pujol Palomer
wrote:
> EL Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:09:54 +0100
> Miklos Szeredi escrigué:
>
>> Maybe it wasn't clear, but the number of lower layers isn't limited by
>> FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH,
> sorry, you have been clear, it's me that have not explained the
EL Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:09:54 +0100
Miklos Szeredi escrigué:
> Maybe it wasn't clear, but the number of lower layers isn't limited by
> FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH,
sorry, you have been clear, it's me that have not explained the purpose
of that patch. This idea is also valid for the main overlayfs
Indeed, Miklos, changing layers dynamically is VERY tricky. Unionfs supports
that, but a good amount of its code all over is dedicated to handling dynamic
layer changes. I advise you to avoid supporting this feature for a while, if
ever: get a small, functional, working overlayfs first.
I per
Thanks to everyone for testing.
Here's an updated patch to fix the statfs Oops.
Maybe it wasn't clear, but the number of lower layers isn't limited by
FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH, only by the max size of the mount option buffer in
the kernel (1 page, usually 4096bytes). So you could have a hundre
4 matches
Mail list logo
