On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 04:28:50PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oleg, sorry for not responding to previous emails, will try to review
> > this
> > things tomorrow (from a glance looks quite good!). Btw, this moment strike
> > my
> > eyes -- why don't we use kmem_cache_zalloc here but do
On 08/09, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 08:57:47PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> ...
> > +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_alloc_inode(struct super_block
> > *sb)
> > ei->pde = NULL;
> > ei->sysctl = NULL;
> > ei->sysctl_entry =
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 08:57:47PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
...
> +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_alloc_inode(struct super_block
> *sb)
> ei->pde = NULL;
> ei->sysctl = NULL;
> ei->sysctl_entry = NULL;
> + ei->pid_entry = NULL;
> e
Add the new "struct pid_entry *" member into struct proc_inode, and
the new helper, is_tgid_pid_entry(), it can be used by *base_stuff
to figure out whether we need tgid or tid info.
Note: this obviously blows struct proc_inode, but I think it is
simple to put ->fd, ->sysctl/sysctl_entry, and the
4 matches
Mail list logo
