On 11/12/2012 02:49 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> Hi Alex
> I apologise for the delay in replying .
That's all right. I often also busy on other Intel tasks and have no
time to look at LKML. :)
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
>>>
Hi Alex
I apologise for the delay in replying .
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
>> mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
>>
Hi Alex
I apologise for the delay in replying .
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
Hi Alex,
What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
On 11/12/2012 02:49 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
Hi Alex
I apologise for the delay in replying .
That's all right. I often also busy on other Intel tasks and have no
time to look at LKML. :)
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy
On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
> mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/13/139)
> is that:
>
> 1.Using nr_running of two different sched groups to decide which one
On 11/07/2012 03:51 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:09:58 +0800
> Alex Shi wrote:
>
>> $for ((i=0; i < I; i++)) ; do while true; do : ; done & done
>>
>> Checking the power consuming with a powermeter on the NHM EP.
>> powersaving performance
>> I = 2 148w
On 11/07/2012 03:51 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:09:58 +0800
Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
$for ((i=0; i I; i++)) ; do while true; do : ; done done
Checking the power consuming with a powermeter on the NHM EP.
powersaving performance
I = 2 148w
On 11/07/2012 12:37 PM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
Hi Alex,
What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/13/139)
is that:
1.Using nr_running of two different sched groups to decide which one
can be
Hi Alex,
What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/13/139)
is that:
1.Using nr_running of two different sched groups to decide which one
can be group_leader or group_min might not be be the right
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:09:58 +0800
Alex Shi wrote:
> $for ((i=0; i < I; i++)) ; do while true; do : ; done & done
>
> Checking the power consuming with a powermeter on the NHM EP.
> powersaving performance
> I = 2 148w160w
> I = 4 175w181w
> I = 8 207w
This patch enabled the power aware consideration in load balance.
As mentioned in the power aware scheduler proposal, Power aware
scheduling has 2 assumptions:
1, race to idle is helpful for power saving
2, shrink tasks on less sched_groups will reduce power consumption
The first assumption make
This patch enabled the power aware consideration in load balance.
As mentioned in the power aware scheduler proposal, Power aware
scheduling has 2 assumptions:
1, race to idle is helpful for power saving
2, shrink tasks on less sched_groups will reduce power consumption
The first assumption make
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:09:58 +0800
Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
$for ((i=0; i I; i++)) ; do while true; do : ; done done
Checking the power consuming with a powermeter on the NHM EP.
powersaving performance
I = 2 148w160w
I = 4 175w181w
I = 8
Hi Alex,
What I am concerned about in this patchset as Peter also
mentioned in the previous discussion of your approach
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/13/139)
is that:
1.Using nr_running of two different sched groups to decide which one
can be group_leader or group_min might not be be the right
14 matches
Mail list logo
