Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> Maybe so, but you can't just go around changing compatible strings. Once
> set, it's an ABI.
Ok, I'll drop the patch from v2.
Thanks,
Luis Araneda.
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:18:49AM -0400, Luis Araneda wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:42 AM Michal Simek wrote:
> > zynq name here is correct which is saying that hardblock is going to be
> > described. Without it it is suggesting that hardblock is not used and it
> > is for ex
Hi Michal,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:42 AM Michal Simek wrote:
> zynq name here is correct which is saying that hardblock is going to be
> described. Without it it is suggesting that hardblock is not used and it
> is for example on zybo with microblaze.
In my opinion, the zynq name is just addin
On 28.6.2018 07:42, Luis Araneda wrote:
> The value "zynq" isn't officially part of the model on any board.
> Additionally, the value is redundant as it's included in a
> subsequent value of the property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Araneda
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/xilinx.txt| 22
The value "zynq" isn't officially part of the model on any board.
Additionally, the value is redundant as it's included in a
subsequent value of the property.
Signed-off-by: Luis Araneda
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/xilinx.txt| 22 +--
arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-cc108.dts
5 matches
Mail list logo
