Re: [SATA] sata-via : bug?(Closed No Bug)

2005-03-24 Thread Jayant Roplekar
This turns out to be a motheboard/bios issue + my lack of careful thinking. And the driver seems to work ok so far. Sorry for the false alarm.. Jay Roplekar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo i

Re: [SATA] sata-via : bug?

2005-03-21 Thread Jayant Roplekar
Any modes in the bios for the SATA ports? Maybe it is in a mode not supported by linux. I know the ICH5 only wanted to work for me in native (enhanced?) mode, not compatible (emulating PATA) mode. Maybe via does something similar. I am puzzles by the UDMA/133 message which makes no sense for S

Re: [SATA] sata-via : bug?

2005-03-21 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:18:16PM -0600, Jay Roplekar wrote: > I have a brand new Western Digital sata drive, VIA KT600 based ECS > motherboard on which I am trying to install various distros (with installers > based on 2.4.26, 2.6.7, 2.6.8, 2.6.11 etc) all of them fail to detect the HD > (

[SATA] sata-via : bug?

2005-03-21 Thread Jay Roplekar
I have a brand new Western Digital sata drive, VIA KT600 based ECS motherboard on which I am trying to install various distros (with installers based on 2.4.26, 2.6.7, 2.6.8, 2.6.11 etc) all of them fail to detect the HD (and bomb out) because sata-via is ignoring it . I have only one disk,