On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:00:35AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Oleg Verych wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> >[]
> >
> >>I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up
> >>source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed
Oleg Verych wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[]
I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up
source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed when fixing
something else), but patches.
IMHO it's dealing with
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[]
> I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up
> source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed when fixing
> something else), but patches.
IMHO it's dealing with consequences, not cause, and it's
Oleg Verych wrote:
29-01-2007, Richard Knutsson:
Oleg Verych wrote:
Nack, big and fat. It's userspace problem.
If our "developers" can't use or update their every-day-tools, it's a
shame. And this is not trolling: i'm using Jed and GNU Emacs, both are
ok with whitespace "production".
29-01-2007, Richard Knutsson:
> Oleg Verych wrote:
>> Nack, big and fat. It's userspace problem.
>>
>> If our "developers" can't use or update their every-day-tools, it's a
>> shame. And this is not trolling: i'm using Jed and GNU Emacs, both are
>> ok with whitespace "production".
> Oh, I hope I
Oleg Verych wrote:
From: Richard Knutsson
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: [SCRIPT] Remove "space damage" from patches
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:37:01 +0100
Hello Andrew and all
Hallo.
I recently tried "git-apply" on the 2.6.20-rc6
> From: Richard Knutsson
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> Subject: [SCRIPT] Remove "space damage" from patches
> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:37:01 +0100
> Hello Andrew and all
Hallo.
> I recently tried "git-apply" on the 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 patch and found it t
Hello Andrew and all
I recently tried "git-apply" on the 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 patch and found it to
complain about white-spaces.
So as a mean to (hopefully) cut down on these nasty white-spaces (and sometimes
tabs) I wrote this
little script. All it does is checking (lines that are going to be
Hello Andrew and all
I recently tried git-apply on the 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 patch and found it to
complain about white-spaces.
So as a mean to (hopefully) cut down on these nasty white-spaces (and sometimes
tabs) I wrote this
little script. All it does is checking (lines that are going to be added)
From: Richard Knutsson
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: [SCRIPT] Remove space damage from patches
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:37:01 +0100
Hello Andrew and all
Hallo.
I recently tried git-apply on the 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 patch and found it to
complain about white-spaces.
So as a mean
Oleg Verych wrote:
From: Richard Knutsson
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: [SCRIPT] Remove space damage from patches
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:37:01 +0100
Hello Andrew and all
Hallo.
I recently tried git-apply on the 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 patch and found it to
complain
29-01-2007, Richard Knutsson:
Oleg Verych wrote:
Nack, big and fat. It's userspace problem.
If our developers can't use or update their every-day-tools, it's a
shame. And this is not trolling: i'm using Jed and GNU Emacs, both are
ok with whitespace production.
Oh, I hope I didn't give the
Oleg Verych wrote:
29-01-2007, Richard Knutsson:
Oleg Verych wrote:
Nack, big and fat. It's userspace problem.
If our developers can't use or update their every-day-tools, it's a
shame. And this is not trolling: i'm using Jed and GNU Emacs, both are
ok with whitespace production.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[]
I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up
source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed when fixing
something else), but patches.
IMHO it's dealing with consequences, not cause, and it's even
Oleg Verych wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[]
I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up
source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed when fixing
something else), but patches.
IMHO it's dealing with
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:00:35AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Oleg Verych wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
[]
I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up
source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed when fixing
16 matches
Mail list logo
