On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:05:21 -0400ve a bit more direct ability to make
> An SPI-like or Debian-like approach with pure democracy might look
> good on paper, but when you have companies donating hundreds of
> thousands of dollars and up to the organization, having a board which
> is elected by mobs
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:49:57PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Then you're misconstruing the interactions. A representational role
> would imply the ability to speak for the community and make promises on
> its behalf. That, as Ted has already said, can't happen. Instead, the
> value to the
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 19:45 -0700, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> > community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
> > elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
> > it's fair to say that while we try to advise
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> community. This was especially true the first year before the TAB was
> elected; but even after we held an election at last year's KS, I think
> it's fair to say that while we try to advise the OSDL and now the LF
> with what the community would like, th
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:14:26PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> It's really just a represent the community type of role. The LF uses
> the TAB to get a sense of the community for various things they and
> their members are thinking. Conversely, the TAB was initially formed to
> get a set of sp
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 16:47 -0700, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
> > Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
>
> Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS com
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> The procedure is to read statements before the election in a BOF at the
> Kernel Summit, so the order is statements first then voting.
Just to clarify, are sponsor delegates and KS committee members entitled
to vote?
- James
--
James Morris
<[EMAI
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:58 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > > > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > > > election will be a
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:43:58PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > > election will be at the 2007 Kernel Summit in a BOF session.
> > >
> > > A
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 14:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > * Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> > > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> >
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 17:22 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The elections for five of the ten members of the Linux Foundation
> > Technical Advisory Board[TAB] are held every year, currently the
> > election will be at the 200
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:33:58 -0700 Chris Wright wrote:
> * Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> > Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> > of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a thin
* Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a reservation about voting for any of the above.
> Normally during any process involving votes, there exists some sort
> of "why you should vote for me" type statement. Does such a thing
> exist for this process ?
Last year each nominee made a stat
13 matches
Mail list logo
