On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:34:26AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 05:27 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> >>b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> >>index
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:34:26AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 05:27 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> >>b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> >>index
On 02/22/2016 05:27 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
index 1ae89a2721d6..fe0d579b63e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
+++
On 02/22/2016 05:27 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
index 1ae89a2721d6..fe0d579b63e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
+++
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> index 1ae89a2721d6..fe0d579b63e3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> @@ -84,11 +84,14 @@ struct
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> index 1ae89a2721d6..fe0d579b63e3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> @@ -84,11 +84,14 @@ struct
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:48:41PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 19/02/16 14:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> > > is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:48:41PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 19/02/16 14:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> > > is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/02/16 14:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> > is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is
>
> What about Xen pv-domU? I wouldn't expect those to
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/02/16 14:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> > is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is
>
> What about Xen pv-domU? I wouldn't expect those to
On 19/02/16 13:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is
> likely inspired by the ACPI IA-PC boot architecture flags, where
> as for RTC it annotates No CMOS real-time clock present.
On 19/02/16 13:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is
> likely inspired by the ACPI IA-PC boot architecture flags, where
> as for RTC it annotates No CMOS real-time clock present.
On 19/02/16 14:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is
What about Xen pv-domU? I wouldn't expect those to have PV_SUPPORTED_RTC
set.
Juergen
> likely inspired by the ACPI IA-PC
On 19/02/16 14:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this
> is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is
What about Xen pv-domU? I wouldn't expect those to have PV_SUPPORTED_RTC
set.
Juergen
> likely inspired by the ACPI IA-PC
14 matches
Mail list logo