Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.26

2005-08-03 Thread Con Kolivas
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:25 am, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:25 am, Peter Williams wrote: > > Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:01, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: > > >>You haven't quite completely fixed the SD calculations it seems: > > >> > > >> > > >>--- Benchmarking simulated cp

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.26

2005-08-03 Thread Con Kolivas
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:25 am, Peter Williams wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:01, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: > >>You haven't quite completely fixed the SD calculations it seems: > >> > >> > >>--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated--- > >>LoadLatenc

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.26

2005-08-03 Thread Peter Williams
Con Kolivas wrote: On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:01, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: You haven't quite completely fixed the SD calculations it seems: --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated--- LoadLatency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU None 2.44 +/- nan

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.26

2005-08-03 Thread Gabriel Devenyi
You haven't quite completely fixed the SD calculations it seems: --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated--- LoadLatency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU None 2.44 +/- nan 48.698.7 Video 12.8 +/- nan 55.2

Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.26

2005-08-03 Thread Con Kolivas
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:01, Gabriel Devenyi wrote: > You haven't quite completely fixed the SD calculations it seems: > > > --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated--- > LoadLatency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU > None 2.44 +/- nan 48.6