Hi Ian,
Personally I'm very appreciate your patches, they'll will
help submitting HP iPaqs SOCs/MFDs, you know... ;-)
Thus, much thanks in advance.
Few comments...
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:54:15AM +, ian wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> > Roughly went
Hi Ian,
Personally I'm very appreciate your patches, they'll will
help submitting HP iPaqs SOCs/MFDs, you know... ;-)
Thus, much thanks in advance.
Few comments...
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:54:15AM +, ian wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote:
Roughly went through
On Nov 21, 2007 11:54 AM, ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> > Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though
> > :-)
> >
> > 1. is it possible to use some name other than "soc_core", maybe
> > "tmio_core" so that
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-)
>
> 1. is it possible to use some name other than "soc_core", maybe
> "tmio_core" so that other multifunction chips sharing a core base
> will live easier.
It's
Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-)
1. is it possible to use some name other than "soc_core", maybe
"tmio_core" so that
other multifunction chips sharing a core base will live easier.
2. those C++ style comments "//" are not so pleasant...
- eric
On
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:04 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Just to note, that there is an alternative implementation for at least
> the tc6393 chip devices. Most current version of those patches can be
> found in the OpenEmbedded monotone.
Yes, this is true. The core code in both cases
Hi,
ian wrote:
Hi guys.
This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices.
Just to note, that there is an alternative implementation for at least
the tc6393 chip devices. Most current version of those patches can be
found in the OpenEmbedded monotone.
it
Hi guys.
This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices.
it introduces a small but useful bit of code as a library for similar
devices, and includes support for these chips on the toshiba e-series
family of handhelds.
please copy me on reply!
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi guys.
This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices.
it introduces a small but useful bit of code as a library for similar
devices, and includes support for these chips on the toshiba e-series
family of handhelds.
please copy me on reply!
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
ian wrote:
Hi guys.
This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices.
Just to note, that there is an alternative implementation for at least
the tc6393 chip devices. Most current version of those patches can be
found in the OpenEmbedded monotone.
it
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:04 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Just to note, that there is an alternative implementation for at least
the tc6393 chip devices. Most current version of those patches can be
found in the OpenEmbedded monotone.
Yes, this is true. The core code in both cases
Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-)
1. is it possible to use some name other than soc_core, maybe
tmio_core so that
other multifunction chips sharing a core base will live easier.
2. those C++ style comments // are not so pleasant...
- eric
On Nov 21,
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote:
Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-)
1. is it possible to use some name other than soc_core, maybe
tmio_core so that other multifunction chips sharing a core base
will live easier.
It's (soc-core)
On Nov 21, 2007 11:54 AM, ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote:
Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though
:-)
1. is it possible to use some name other than soc_core, maybe
tmio_core so that other multifunction
14 matches
Mail list logo
