On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:36:40PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
> >
> > This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> > if there are patches that you feel should be applied to
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:36:40PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
>> trees these days anyway?
>
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
Ok if that is really what we are going with,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
> trees these days anyway?
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Zwane Mwaikambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Eric,
> Thanks for getting this cruft cleaned up. I have a few comments
> regarding;
>
> handle-irqs-pending-in-irr-during-irq-migration.patch
>
> 1) It relies on checking the IRR, this could race with the corresponding
> vector bit being
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-handle-irqs-pending-in-irr-during-irq-migration.patch
> >>
> >> That's mainly an Andi decision. Let's cc him.
> >
> > Would be good to have
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-handle-irqs-pending-in-irr-during-irq-migration.patch
That's mainly an Andi decision. Let's cc him.
Would be good to have Eric also ack
Zwane Mwaikambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Eric,
Thanks for getting this cruft cleaned up. I have a few comments
regarding;
handle-irqs-pending-in-irr-during-irq-migration.patch
1) It relies on checking the IRR, this could race with the corresponding
vector bit being set by
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
trees these days anyway?
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:28:27AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
What are the rules that are supposed to govern backports to stable
trees these days anyway?
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
Ok if that is really what we are going with, the this
Hmm.. I seem to have failed to send out this reply a few days ago :(
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >
>> >
>
Hmm.. I seem to have failed to send out this reply a few days ago :(
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
> please let me know.
This seems appropriate for 2.6.19-stable.
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
This seems appropriate for 2.6.19-stable. It
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:39:01PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>> What is the status of:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
> >>>
Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've tested it and found no problems so far. It's definitely
> better than what's there now. :)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would be good to have Eric also ack them as safe and obvious.
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
> please let me know.
This is the rest of the NAPI fixes for
Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> What is the status of:
>>>
>>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
>>>
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>>
>> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
>> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
>> please let me know.
>
> This patch
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
> please let me know.
This patch should go in 2.6.19 and 2.6.20
> commit 2fb12a9bca5ad9aa6dcd2c639b4a7656a8843ef8
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue Feb 13 13:26:25 2007 +0100
>
> [PATCH] x86-64: survive having no irq mapping for a vector
Putting that patch into stable would be a good idea, agreed.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:47:37AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
> > >
> > > This will probably be the last release of
Greg KH wrote:
>> What is the status of:
>>
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
>>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:31:41PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
> >
> > This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> > if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
>> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What is the status of:
>>>
>>>
>>
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What is the status of:
>>
>>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
>>
>
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
> >
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
> >
> > This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> > if there are patches that you feel should be
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
> please let me know.
>
> There are 21 patches in this series,
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
> please let me know.
>
The attached fixes an oops in the
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
> please let me know.
The attached patch is in 2.6.20 and fixes
I wrote:
> I hope you can extract the patch from this MIME attachment.
Probably not unless I attach it for real.
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== --=- =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
Subject: [PATCH] Missing critical phys_to_virt in lib/swiotlb.c
From: David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 04
Greg KH wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
>
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
> please let me know.
There is one here: "Missing critical
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
There is one here: Missing critical
I wrote:
I hope you can extract the patch from this MIME attachment.
Probably not unless I attach it for real.
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== --=- =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
Subject: [PATCH] Missing critical phys_to_virt in lib/swiotlb.c
From: David Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 04 Feb
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
The attached patch is in 2.6.20 and fixes
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
The attached fixes an oops in the usbnet
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
There are 21 patches in this series, all will
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the status of:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the status of:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:31:41PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
Greg KH wrote:
What is the status of:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:47:37AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:31:41 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable
commit 2fb12a9bca5ad9aa6dcd2c639b4a7656a8843ef8
Author: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Feb 13 13:26:25 2007 +0100
[PATCH] x86-64: survive having no irq mapping for a vector
Putting that patch into stable would be a good idea, agreed.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
This patch should go in 2.6.19 and 2.6.20
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
This patch should go in
Andi Kleen wrote:
What is the status of:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
Greg KH wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
This is the rest of the NAPI fixes for
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've tested it and found no problems so far. It's definitely
better than what's there now. :)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would be good to have Eric also ack them as safe and obvious.
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't think
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:39:01PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Andi Kleen wrote:
What is the status of:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-simplfy-__assign_irq_vector.patch
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.5 release.
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel should be applied to that tree,
please let me know.
There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a
54 matches
Mail list logo
