On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:14:00AM +0200, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
> >KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte.
> >pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a
> >ptepage is allocated afresh.
> >
> >Signed-off-by:
IL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barnes, Jesse; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Siddha, Suresh B
>Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove
>KERNPG_TABLE from pte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte.
pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a
ptepage is allocated afresh.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte.
pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a
ptepage is allocated afresh.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barnes, Jesse; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Siddha, Suresh B
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove
KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:14:00AM +0200, Mika Penttilä wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte.
pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a
ptepage is allocated afresh.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte.
pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a
ptepage is allocated afresh.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index:
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte.
pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a
ptepage is allocated afresh.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
8 matches
Mail list logo