Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-16 Thread Venki Pallipadi
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:14:00AM +0200, Mika Penttilä wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: > >KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte. > >pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a > >ptepage is allocated afresh. > > > >Signed-off-by:

RE: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-16 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
IL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barnes, Jesse; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Siddha, Suresh B >Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove >KERNPG_TABLE from pte

Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-16 Thread Mika Penttilä
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte. pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a ptepage is allocated afresh. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL

Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-16 Thread Mika Penttilä
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte. pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a ptepage is allocated afresh. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-16 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barnes, Jesse; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Siddha, Suresh B Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: KERNPG_TABLE was a bug

Re: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-16 Thread Venki Pallipadi
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:14:00AM +0200, Mika Penttilä wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte. pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a ptepage is allocated afresh. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi

[patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-15 Thread venkatesh . pallipadi
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte. pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a ptepage is allocated afresh. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index:

[patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-15 Thread venkatesh . pallipadi
KERNPG_TABLE was a bug in earlier patch. Remove it from pte. pte_val() check is redundant as this routine is called immediately after a ptepage is allocated afresh. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: