Re: [proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

2015-03-03 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/5/535 ok found one: i'll read up and see if there's evidence that the idea mentioned a couple of days ago has occurred to the cgroups devs (tejun) - i think it has, but i'll need to check to be sure. l. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu

Re: [proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

2015-03-03 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:45 AM, David Lang wrote: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>> in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, op

Re: [proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

2015-03-02 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang wrote: On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc, systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to bec

Re: [proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

2015-03-02 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang wrote: > On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >> in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc, >> systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the >> sole exlcusive process permitted to manag

Re: [proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

2015-03-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang wrote: > On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >> in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc, >> systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the >> sole exlcusive process permitted to manag

Re: [proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

2015-03-01 Thread David Lang
On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc, systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the sole exlcusive process permitted to manage cgroups. given that, just as one specific example, depinit

[proposal] delegating cgroup manager to non-PID1

2015-03-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
(i am subscribed nomail to lkml, please cc thx) in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc, systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the sole exlcusive process permitted to manage cgroups. given that, just as one specific example, depinit is only ar