Re: [rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 4:03 pm, Oleg Verych wrote: > Let me propose you to test this as solution, that need no awk, only shell: Actually awk is one of the standard Single Unix Specification (version 3) utilities and the kernel build uses it in a number of places, such as

[rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

> On Tuesday 23 January 2007 7:49 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: >> If the kernel is being compiled on a non-Linux system (eg: legacy Unix) >> then it is, I guess, possible for `awk' and `gawk' to offer different >> features. If the kernel's use of gawk uses GNU extensions then this patch >> might

[rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

On Tuesday 23 January 2007 7:49 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: If the kernel is being compiled on a non-Linux system (eg: legacy Unix) then it is, I guess, possible for `awk' and `gawk' to offer different features. If the kernel's use of gawk uses GNU extensions then this patch might break things

Re: [rft] (g)awk substitution (Re: [PATCH] sed s/gawk/awk/scripts/gen_init_ramfs.sh)

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 4:03 pm, Oleg Verych wrote: Let me propose you to test this as solution, that need no awk, only shell: Actually awk is one of the standard Single Unix Specification (version 3) utilities and the kernel build uses it in a number of places, such as