Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:26:33AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since > >any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting. > > Straight over

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:26:33AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting. Straight over the top of

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-25 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since >any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting. Straight over the top of my head yesterday :) Is the following what you had in mind?

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-25 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting. Straight over the top of my head yesterday :) Is the following what you had in mind?

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Looking at the .config, the problem is actually: > CONFIG_BROKEN=y > >You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since >any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting. Very good point.

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:13:02AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:39:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: > >> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >>

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:39:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm >>

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm > >kernel. > 097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error: redefinition of

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With > 2k (raw) errors in 97.something builds of 2.6.12.3, why go > looking for trouble in -mm? Because -mm is the development tree. The things in -mm are what's

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm >kernel. 097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error: redefinition of `drm_ioremap_nocache' 097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163:

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:22 +0200, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> context. Deliberately simplistic for traceability at the moment, truncated > >> error length for this post. > >> > >If you could put the data online somewhere I'd

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:22 +0200, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> context. Deliberately simplistic for traceability at the moment, truncated >> error length for this post. >> >If you could put the data online somewhere I'd be interrested in >taking a look at it. 7.4MB raw data -->

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today > I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name. > Percentage is error_builds / total_builds. > > build script similar to: > count=0 >

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 04:28:54PM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: > Greetings, Hi Grant, > Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today > I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name. > Percentage is error_builds / total_builds. > > build script

2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
Greetings, Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name. Percentage is error_builds / total_builds. build script similar to: count=0 while [ $((++count)) -le $limit ]; do trial=$(printf %003d

2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
Greetings, Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name. Percentage is error_builds / total_builds. build script similar to: count=0 while [ $((++count)) -le $limit ]; do trial=$(printf %003d

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 04:28:54PM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: Greetings, Hi Grant, Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name. Percentage is error_builds / total_builds. build script similar

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name. Percentage is error_builds / total_builds. build script similar to: count=0 while [

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:22 +0200, Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: context. Deliberately simplistic for traceability at the moment, truncated error length for this post. If you could put the data online somewhere I'd be interrested in taking a look at it. 7.4MB raw data -- low info

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:22 +0200, Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: context. Deliberately simplistic for traceability at the moment, truncated error length for this post. If you could put the data online somewhere I'd be interrested in

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm kernel. 097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error: redefinition of `drm_ioremap_nocache' 097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error:

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With 2k (raw) errors in 97.something builds of 2.6.12.3, why go looking for trouble in -mm? Because -mm is the development tree. The things in -mm are what's eventually

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm kernel. 097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error: redefinition of

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:39:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm kernel.

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:13:02AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:39:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's generally

Re: 2.6.13-rc3 test: finding compile errors with make randconfig

2005-07-24 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at the .config, the problem is actually: CONFIG_BROKEN=y You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting. Very good point. $ grep