* Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forwarding it off list.
>
> Thanks Ingo. I'm very interested if it works for you to do this.
i've integrated it into -rt (see the patch below), but i marked it
obsolete and i might not be able to carry it for long - we'll see. The
preferred solution
Forwarding it off list.
Thanks Ingo. I'm very interested if it works for you to do this.
Cheers,
Mark
On 11/28/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I know there were some comments awhile back about being required
> > to switch to PAM. Has
* Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I know there were some comments awhile back about being required
> > to switch to PAM. Has that occurred?
> >
> >If not then there is a regression issue for realtime-lsm.
>
> As Realtime LSM is an out of tree module and there's no stable
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:53 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I know you've pushed
> me to move to PAM telling me realtime-lsm wasn't going to work in the
> future. I really just wanted to know that PAM was now a requirement
> instead of only best practice.
I said it was not guaranteed to work. It
On 11/28/06, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Ingo,
>I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
> 2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
> am unable to build the realtime-lsm package
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Ingo,
>I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
> 2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
> am unable to build the realtime-lsm package against them so no reason
> to reboot.
>
>I know
* Karsten Wiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this fixes issues like rmmod hanging and inodes leaking.
thanks ... i have reverted the other dcache.c changes as well.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
* Karsten Wiese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this fixes issues like rmmod hanging and inodes leaking.
thanks ... i have reverted the other dcache.c changes as well.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Ingo,
I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
am unable to build the realtime-lsm package against them so no reason
to reboot.
I know there
On 11/28/06, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Ingo,
I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
am unable to build the realtime-lsm package
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:53 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I know you've pushed
me to move to PAM telling me realtime-lsm wasn't going to work in the
future. I really just wanted to know that PAM was now a requirement
instead of only best practice.
I said it was not guaranteed to work. It should
* Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there were some comments awhile back about being required
to switch to PAM. Has that occurred?
If not then there is a regression issue for realtime-lsm.
As Realtime LSM is an out of tree module and there's no stable kernel
module
Forwarding it off list.
Thanks Ingo. I'm very interested if it works for you to do this.
Cheers,
Mark
On 11/28/06, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there were some comments awhile back about being required
to switch to PAM. Has that
* Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forwarding it off list.
Thanks Ingo. I'm very interested if it works for you to do this.
i've integrated it into -rt (see the patch below), but i marked it
obsolete and i might not be able to carry it for long - we'll see. The
preferred solution is
> i've released the 2.6.19-rc6-rt5 tree, which can be downloaded from the
Hi
this fixes issues like rmmod hanging and inodes leaking.
Karsten
--- fs/dcache.c~2006-11-21 11:25:11.0 +0100
+++ fs/dcache.c 2006-11-26 15:20:31.0 +0100
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void d
i've released the 2.6.19-rc6-rt5 tree, which can be downloaded from the
Hi
this fixes issues like rmmod hanging and inodes leaking.
Karsten
--- fs/dcache.c~2006-11-21 11:25:11.0 +0100
+++ fs/dcache.c 2006-11-26 15:20:31.0 +0100
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void dput
Something is really wrong with page alloc on this one. Compiled 2.6.19-rc6-rt5
with the one patch to page_alloc.c as posted on the list here.
Kernel uses around 50% mem and 30% swap without doing anything.
I get a lot of these:
X invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oomkilladj=0
Something is really wrong with page alloc on this one. Compiled 2.6.19-rc6-rt5
with the one patch to page_alloc.c as posted on the list here.
Kernel uses around 50% mem and 30% swap without doing anything.
I get a lot of these:
X invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oomkilladj=0
18 matches
Mail list logo
