* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 20:50 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Robert Crocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/19/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >yeah. This is something that triggers very rarely on certain boxes. Not
> > >
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 20:50 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Robert Crocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 12/19/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >yeah. This is something that triggers very rarely on certain boxes. Not
> > >fixed yet, and it's been around for some time.
> >
> > I
* Robert Crocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >yeah. This is something that triggers very rarely on certain boxes. Not
> >fixed yet, and it's been around for some time.
>
> Is there anything you would like me to do to help diagnose this?
to
On 12/19/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yeah. This is something that triggers very rarely on certain boxes. Not
fixed yet, and it's been around for some time.
Is there anything you would like me to do to help diagnose this?
--
Robert Crocombe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
* Robert Crocombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Almost exactly 24 hours after booting 2.6.19.1-rt15, I encountered the
> following:
>
> softirq-tasklet/49[CPU#3]: BUG in __tasklet_action at kernel/softirq.c:568
yeah. This is something that triggers very rarely on certain boxes. Not
fixed yet, a
Almost exactly 24 hours after booting 2.6.19.1-rt15, I encountered the
following:
softirq-tasklet/49[CPU#3]: BUG in __tasklet_action at kernel/softirq.c:568
Call Trace:
[] __WARN_ON+0x5c/0x74
[] __tasklet_action+0xae/0xf2
[] ksoftirqd+0xfc/0x198
[] ksoftirqd+0x0/0x198
[] kthread+0xd1/0x101
[] ch
6 matches
Mail list logo