> > This is all scary and generally not needed spew but handy for debug.
> >
> > Looks like a PCMCIA layer bug. It should be respecting IRQ assignment
> > (not just allocation) by other resource configuration layers.
>
> Ah thanks for taking a look. I was slowly getting the impression from older
On Monday 12 February 2007, Alan wrote:
> > [ 23.783913] Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ
> > sharing enabled
> > [ 23.787063] pnp: Device 00:0c activated.
> > [ 23.787420] 00:0c: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
>
> So the PnP layers put a device on IRQ 4, whi
> [ 23.783913] Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ
> sharing enabled
> [ 23.787063] pnp: Device 00:0c activated.
> [ 23.787420] 00:0c: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
So the PnP layers put a device on IRQ 4, which is sensible
> [ 37.516000] eth1: orinoco_cs
Hi,
i upgraded my system from ubuntu edgy to feisty and a new kernel came with it
(2.6.15 vs. 2.6.20). Sadly my wireless card (pcmcia) has stopped working
under this system. Seeing a backttrace in the dmesg output made me believe
it's a kernel problem. I built a vanilla kernel to see if maybe
4 matches
Mail list logo