> Is this technically feasible?
It's technically pointless. Take a look at bootsplash, though.
--
Måns Rullgård
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bootsplash does exactly what I was complaining about. It controls only some
part of the process of *booting* into the desktop without smooth transition
(though it's
Dennis Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I feel disturbed by the fact that when display-controlling programs
> are started in line (like the bootloader, linux, and finally
> xdm/gdm/kdm), there appear several switches of display resolution,
> text- and graphics mode, and background
Hello,
I feel disturbed by the fact that when display-controlling programs are started
in line (like the bootloader, linux, and finally xdm/gdm/kdm), there appear
several switches of display resolution, text- and graphics mode, and background
images. I asked myself how to get that more smooth
Hello,
I feel disturbed by the fact that when display-controlling programs are started
in line (like the bootloader, linux, and finally xdm/gdm/kdm), there appear
several switches of display resolution, text- and graphics mode, and background
images. I asked myself how to get that more smooth
Dennis Heuer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I feel disturbed by the fact that when display-controlling programs
are started in line (like the bootloader, linux, and finally
xdm/gdm/kdm), there appear several switches of display resolution,
text- and graphics mode, and background images. I
Is this technically feasible?
It's technically pointless. Take a look at bootsplash, though.
--
Måns Rullgård
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bootsplash does exactly what I was complaining about. It controls only some
part of the process of *booting* into the desktop without smooth transition
(though it's
6 matches
Mail list logo
