Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-26 Thread Alan Cox
> cpu family : 5 > model : 8 > model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor > ^^ > > Shouldn't it be K6-2? We report what AMD report - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-26 Thread Alan Cox
cpu family : 5 model : 8 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor ^^ Shouldn't it be K6-2? We report what AMD report - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read

re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-24 Thread James Sutherland
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the words of Barry K. Nathan : > > > > Why they didn't call it K6-4 is anyones guess. > > I read somewhere (I don't have a URL handy, sorry) that the reason AMD > > went with K6-2+ is that, apparently, the K6-2 name is well-known, and > > they

re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-24 Thread James Sutherland
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the words of Barry K. Nathan : Why they didn't call it K6-4 is anyones guess. I read somewhere (I don't have a URL handy, sorry) that the reason AMD went with K6-2+ is that, apparently, the K6-2 name is well-known, and they wanted to

[OT] Re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Barry K. Nathan
> IIRC, the K6-2+ is really a K6-3 core with the on-chip L2 cache disabled > because of defects. My recollection (starting with the K6-3+ and then going to the K6-2+ - if there are any errors, please correct me): The K6-3+ is a K6-3 produced on a smaller process (180nm, as opposed to the K6-3's

Re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Vince Weaver
> IIRC, the K6-2+ is really a K6-3 core with the on-chip L2 cache disabled > because of defects. Hmmm I don't think so. From the dmesg of my K6-2+ [a 500Mhz underclocked to 75Mhzx6 on my poor PA-2007 motherboard] CPU: L1 I Cache: 32K L1 D Cache: 32K (32 bytes/line) CPU: L2 Cache: 128K CPU:

Re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Brian Gerst
"Barry K. Nathan" wrote: > > > The K6-2+ is actually the CPU that was released > > _after_ K6-3. Go figure. > > > > Why they didn't call it K6-4 is anyones guess. > > I read somewhere (I don't have a URL handy, sorry) that the reason AMD went > with K6-2+ is that, apparently, the K6-2 name is

re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread davej
In the words of Barry K. Nathan : > > Why they didn't call it K6-4 is anyones guess. > I read somewhere (I don't have a URL handy, sorry) that the reason AMD > went with K6-2+ is that, apparently, the K6-2 name is well-known, and > they wanted to build on that... Sounds like a marketing thing.

K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Barry K. Nathan
> The K6-2+ is actually the CPU that was released > _after_ K6-3. Go figure. > > Why they didn't call it K6-4 is anyones guess. I read somewhere (I don't have a URL handy, sorry) that the reason AMD went with K6-2+ is that, apparently, the K6-2 name is well-known, and they wanted to build on

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-22 Thread davej
Andreas Eibach proclaimed.. >Vince, wasn't it supposed to be > > A K6-2+: >model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor > > A K6-3: > model name : AMD-K6(tm)-III Processor I don't think so. The K6-2 yeilds what you mentioned above. The K6-2+ is actually the CPU that was released

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-22 Thread Andreas Eibach
- Original Message - From: "Vince Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A plain K6: >model : AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions > > A K6-2: >model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor > > A K6-3: >model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor > > A K6-2+: > model name

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-22 Thread Andreas Eibach
- Original Message - From: "Vince Weaver" [EMAIL PROTECTED] A plain K6: model : AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions A K6-2: model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor A K6-3: model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor A K6-2+: model name :

K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Barry K. Nathan
The K6-2+ is actually the CPU that was released _after_ K6-3. Go figure. Why they didn't call it K6-4 is anyones guess. I read somewhere (I don't have a URL handy, sorry) that the reason AMD went with K6-2+ is that, apparently, the K6-2 name is well-known, and they wanted to build on

Re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Brian Gerst
"Barry K. Nathan" wrote: The K6-2+ is actually the CPU that was released _after_ K6-3. Go figure. Why they didn't call it K6-4 is anyones guess. I read somewhere (I don't have a URL handy, sorry) that the reason AMD went with K6-2+ is that, apparently, the K6-2 name is well-known,

Re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Vince Weaver
IIRC, the K6-2+ is really a K6-3 core with the on-chip L2 cache disabled because of defects. Hmmm I don't think so. From the dmesg of my K6-2+ [a 500Mhz underclocked to 75Mhzx6 on my poor PA-2007 motherboard] CPU: L1 I Cache: 32K L1 D Cache: 32K (32 bytes/line) CPU: L2 Cache: 128K CPU:

[OT] Re: K6-2+ name (was Re: AMD CPU misdetection?)

2000-10-22 Thread Barry K. Nathan
IIRC, the K6-2+ is really a K6-3 core with the on-chip L2 cache disabled because of defects. My recollection (starting with the K6-3+ and then going to the K6-2+ - if there are any errors, please correct me): The K6-3+ is a K6-3 produced on a smaller process (180nm, as opposed to the K6-3's

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-19 Thread Matthias Andree
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: > root@asdf:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > cpu family : 5 > model : 8 > model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor > ^^ > > Shouldn't it be K6-2? No, that's what is

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-19 Thread Gábor Lénárt
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:50:24AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Kernel == 2.2.17 > CPU == AMD K6-2 350 > > Clock set to 300Mhz > > 2 root@asdf:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > cpu family : 5 > model : 8 > model name :

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-19 Thread Gbor Lnrt
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:50:24AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: Kernel == 2.2.17 CPU == AMD K6-2 350 Clock set to 300Mhz 2 root@asdf:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 8 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-19 Thread Matthias Andree
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: root@asdf:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 8 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor ^^ Shouldn't it be K6-2? No, that's what is read

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-18 Thread Vince Weaver
> model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor > Shouldn't it be K6-2? nope A plain K6: model : AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions A K6-2: model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor A K6-3: model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor A K6-2+: model name : AMD-K6(tm)-III

AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-18 Thread Mike A. Harris
Kernel == 2.2.17 CPU == AMD K6-2 350 Clock set to 300Mhz 2 root@asdf:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 8 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor ^^ Shouldn't it be K6-2? stepping: 12

AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-18 Thread Mike A. Harris
Kernel == 2.2.17 CPU == AMD K6-2 350 Clock set to 300Mhz 2 root@asdf:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 8 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor ^^ Shouldn't it be K6-2? stepping: 12

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

2000-10-18 Thread Vince Weaver
model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor Shouldn't it be K6-2? nope A plain K6: model : AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions A K6-2: model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor A K6-3: model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor A K6-2+: model name : AMD-K6(tm)-III