On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:42:58PM +0200, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Greg KH schrieb:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
> >
> >
> > Nah, this simple patch to snapshot fixes it.
> >
> > I've also generated
Greg KH schrieb:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
>
>
> Nah, this simple patch to snapshot fixes it.
>
> I've also generated the 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 snapshot and fixed up the
> directory on kernel.org so it
Greg KH schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
Nah, this simple patch to snapshot fixes it.
I've also generated the 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 snapshot and fixed up the
directory on kernel.org so it should now work
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:42:58PM +0200, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Greg KH schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
Nah, this simple patch to snapshot fixes it.
I've also generated the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
Nah, this simple patch to snapshot fixes it.
I've also generated the 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 snapshot and fixed up the
directory on kernel.org so it should now work properly if you apply
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >with the requirement (for me) that I not be required to use BK?
> >I'll munge scripts or whatever...
> >but I guess that I'll also need a kernel.org account to do that.
>
> Should hopefully just be changing
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >with the requirement (for me) that I not be required to use BK?
> >I'll munge scripts or whatever...
> >but I guess that I'll also need a kernel.org account to do that.
>
> Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
sean wrote:
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
I can't explain it other than "the snapshots are broken."
All I do is look around for them, and behold,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:47:24PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> sean wrote:
> >Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Did you look in
> >>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
> >>
> >
> >Yes I did.
> >
> >Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
> >
> >None since then?
>
sean wrote:
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
I can't explain it other than "the snapshots are broken."
All I do is look around for them, and behold, just look in
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
sean wrote:
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
I can't explain it other than the snapshots are broken.
All I do is look around for them, and behold, just look in
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:47:24PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
sean wrote:
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
I can't explain it other
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
sean wrote:
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
Yes I did.
Latest is 2.6.12-rc1-bk2, March 26.
None since then?
I can't explain it other than the snapshots are broken.
All I do is look around for them, and behold,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
with the requirement (for me) that I not be required to use BK?
I'll munge scripts or whatever...
but I guess that I'll also need a kernel.org account to do that.
Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
hmm, it's
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
with the requirement (for me) that I not be required to use BK?
I'll munge scripts or whatever...
but I guess that I'll also need a kernel.org account to do that.
Should hopefully just be changing
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:42PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Should hopefully just be changing get-version.pl ...
Nah, this simple patch to snapshot fixes it.
I've also generated the 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 snapshot and fixed up the
directory on kernel.org so it should now work properly if you apply
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Did you look in
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
So "script are confused" mean "look in snapshots/old" :D
I was expecting them to be in testing/something...
Thanks Randy and Barry!
Best regards,
Norberto
--
Norberto Bensa
informática BeNSA
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Barry K. Nathan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:14:33PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
[quote rewrapped to keep it within 80 columns]
Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any
relevant post in LKML.
You can still get to the snapshots using this
Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:14:33PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> [quote rewrapped to keep it within 80 columns]
>
> > Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any
> > relevant post in LKML.
>
> You can still get to the snapshots using this URL,
Barry K. Nathan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:14:33PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
[quote rewrapped to keep it within 80 columns]
Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any
relevant post in LKML.
You can still get to the snapshots using this URL, but as I
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Barry K. Nathan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:14:33PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
[quote rewrapped to keep it within 80 columns]
Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any
relevant post in LKML.
You can still get to the snapshots using this
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Did you look in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/ ?
So script are confused mean look in snapshots/old :D
I was expecting them to be in testing/something...
Thanks Randy and Barry!
Best regards,
Norberto
--
Norberto Bensa
informática BeNSA
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:14:33PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
[quote rewrapped to keep it within 80 columns]
> Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any
> relevant post in LKML.
It happens whenever the kernel.org scripts get confused. It's happened
at least once
Hello,
Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any relevant
post in LKML.
Many thanks in advance,
Norberto
--
Norberto Bensa
informática BeNSA
4544-9692 / 15-4190-6344
Buenos Aires, Argentina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Hello,
Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any relevant
post in LKML.
Many thanks in advance,
Norberto
--
Norberto Bensa
informática BeNSA
4544-9692 / 15-4190-6344
Buenos Aires, Argentina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:14:33PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
[quote rewrapped to keep it within 80 columns]
Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any
relevant post in LKML.
It happens whenever the kernel.org scripts get confused. It's happened
at least once
28 matches
Mail list logo
