Re: [PATCH] selftests: firmware: Add details in error logging

2025-06-02 Thread Shuah Khan
On 5/25/25 12:26, Harshal Wadhwa wrote: On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 03:49, Shuah Khan wrote: On 5/16/25 09:39, Harshal wrote: Specify details in logs of failed cases Use die() instead of exit() when write to sys_path fails Please explain why this change is needed? Signed-off-by: Harshal

Re: [PATCH] selftests: firmware: Add details in error logging

2025-05-25 Thread Harshal Wadhwa
On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 03:49, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 5/16/25 09:39, Harshal wrote: > > Specify details in logs of failed cases > > > > Use die() instead of exit() when write to > > sys_path fails > > Please explain why this change is needed? > > > &g

Re: [PATCH] selftests: firmware: Add details in error logging

2025-05-22 Thread Shuah Khan
On 5/16/25 09:39, Harshal wrote: Specify details in logs of failed cases Use die() instead of exit() when write to sys_path fails Please explain why this change is needed? Signed-off-by: Harshal --- tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c | 17 + 1 file changed

[PATCH] selftests: firmware: Add details in error logging

2025-05-16 Thread Harshal
Specify details in logs of failed cases Use die() instead of exit() when write to sys_path fails Signed-off-by: Harshal --- tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_namespace.c | 17 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware

[PATCH v4 05/12] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

2025-03-11 Thread Brendan Jackman
So this can be debugged more easily. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c index d6b57e5a2e1d7611aa158

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

2025-02-28 Thread Dev Jain
On 28/02/25 10:24 pm, Brendan Jackman wrote: So this can be debugged more easily. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman Reviewed-by: Dev Jain

[PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

2025-02-28 Thread Brendan Jackman
So this can be debugged more easily. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c index ec842bbb9f18e291fa51d

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

2025-02-28 Thread Brendan Jackman
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 19:26, Brendan Jackman wrote: > nr_pages_per_cpu = bytes / page_size / nr_threads; > if (!nr_pages_per_cpu) { > - _err("invalid MiB"); > + _err("pages_per_cpu = 0, cannot test (%lu / %lu / %lu)", > + nr_pages_

[PATCH v2 6/9] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

2025-02-21 Thread Brendan Jackman
So this can be debugged more easily. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c index ec842bbb9f18e291fa51d

Re: [PATCH 5/6] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

2025-02-20 Thread Brendan Jackman
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 16:03, Brendan Jackman wrote: > nr_pages_per_cpu = bytes / page_size / nr_cpus; > if (!nr_pages_per_cpu) { > - _err("invalid MiB"); > + _err("invalid MiB %lu (%lu / %lu / %lu)", > + nr_pages_per_cpu, bytes, pa

[PATCH 5/6] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

2025-02-20 Thread Brendan Jackman
So this can be debugged more easily. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c index db5366b4766e5bfa2d115

Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] kasan: docs: update HW_TAGS implementation details section

2021-03-12 Thread Marco Elver
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:24PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Update the "Implementation details" section for HW_TAGS KASAN: > > - Punctuation, readability, and other minor clean-ups. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov Reviewed-by: Marco Elver > --- > Do

Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] kasan: docs: update SW_TAGS implementation details section

2021-03-12 Thread Marco Elver
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:24PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Update the "Implementation details" section for SW_TAGS KASAN: > > - Clarify the introduction sentence. > - Punctuation, readability, and other minor clean-ups. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalo

Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] kasan: docs: update GENERIC implementation details section

2021-03-12 Thread Marco Elver
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:24PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Update the "Implementation details" section for generic KASAN: > > - Don't mention kmemcheck, it's not present in the kernel anymore. > - Don't mention GCC as the only supported compiler. > -

[PATCH v2 08/11] kasan: docs: update HW_TAGS implementation details section

2021-03-12 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Update the "Implementation details" section for HW_TAGS KASAN: - Punctuation, readability, and other minor clean-ups. Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov --- Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 26 +- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) di

[PATCH v2 07/11] kasan: docs: update SW_TAGS implementation details section

2021-03-12 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Update the "Implementation details" section for SW_TAGS KASAN: - Clarify the introduction sentence. - Punctuation, readability, and other minor clean-ups. Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov --- Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 39 +++ 1 file changed, 19

[PATCH v2 06/11] kasan: docs: update GENERIC implementation details section

2021-03-12 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Update the "Implementation details" section for generic KASAN: - Don't mention kmemcheck, it's not present in the kernel anymore. - Don't mention GCC as the only supported compiler. - Update kasan_mem_to_shadow() definition to match actual code. - Punctuation, readabili

[PATCH 08/11] kasan: docs: update HW_TAGS implementation details section

2021-03-11 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Update the "Implementation details" section for HW_TAGS KASAN: - Punctuation, readability, and other minor clean-ups. Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov --- Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 26 +- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) di

[PATCH 06/11] kasan: docs: update GENERIC implementation details section

2021-03-11 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Update the "Implementation details" section for generic KASAN: - Don't mention kmemcheck, it's not present in the kernel anymore. - Don't mention GCC as the only supported compiler. - Update kasan_mem_to_shadow() definition to match actual code. - Punctuation, readabili

[PATCH 07/11] kasan: docs: update SW_TAGS implementation details section

2021-03-11 Thread Andrey Konovalov
Update the "Implementation details" section for SW_TAGS KASAN: - Clarify the introduction sentence. - Punctuation, readability, and other minor clean-ups. Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov --- Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 39 +++ 1 file changed, 19

Re: [RFC 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-impl: Get rid of Marvell's implementation details

2021-03-02 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 11:40 +, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2021-02-26 14:03, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > arm-smmu can now deal with integrations on buses that don't support > > 64bit MMIO accesses. No need to create a special case for that on > > Marvell's integration. > > This breaks compa

Re: [RFC 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-impl: Get rid of Marvell's implementation details

2021-03-02 Thread Robin Murphy
On 2021-02-26 14:03, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: arm-smmu can now deal with integrations on buses that don't support 64bit MMIO accesses. No need to create a special case for that on Marvell's integration. This breaks compatibility with existing DTs. Robin. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Jul

[RFC 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-impl: Get rid of Marvell's implementation details

2021-02-26 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
arm-smmu can now deal with integrations on buses that don't support 64bit MMIO accesses. No need to create a special case for that on Marvell's integration. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c | 21 - 1 file changed, 21 deletio

Re:Reconfirm your Details

2021-02-25 Thread Mr Jeffery Mark
the right person reconfirm your following information details below: FULL NAME: AGE: HOME ADDRESS FOR THE DELIVERY: MOBILE NO: OCCUPATION: COUNTRY: NEAREST AIRPORT: Please, get back to me asap and also endeavor to keep this to yourself as am doing this selfless service to ensure the diplomat&#

[PATCH v3 3/3] docs: arm: marvell: clarify some unimportant Armada 6x0 details

2021-02-15 Thread Lubomir Rintel
MMP2 is used in XO-1.75 and MMP3 is now supported in mainline. Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel --- Documentation/arm/marvell.rst | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arm/marvell.rst b/Documentation/arm/marvell.rst index 615dd8a13807a..7f96068a9eae2

[PATCH v2 4/5] docs: arm: marvell: clarify some unimportant Armada 6x0 details

2021-02-03 Thread Lubomir Rintel
MMP2 is used in XO-1.75 and MMP3 is now supported in mainline. Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel --- Documentation/arm/marvel.rst | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arm/marvel.rst b/Documentation/arm/marvel.rst index bcf3f4e3e8faf..d83917f226376 10

[PATCH 4/5] docs: arm: marvell: clarify some unimportant Armada 6x0 details

2021-01-29 Thread Lubomir Rintel
MMP2 is used in XO-1.75 and MMP3 is now supported in mainline. Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel --- Documentation/arm/marvel.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arm/marvel.rst b/Documentation/arm/marvel.rst index 0c291d1091f1d..43f2fe407796e 100

[PATCH 3/5] soundwire: bus: add more details to track failed transfers

2021-01-14 Thread Bard Liao
The current error log does not provide details on the type of transfers and which address/count was requested. All this information can help locate in which parts of the configuration process an error occurred. Co-developed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart Signed-off

!!! Ask Details For Relief

2020-12-15 Thread United Nations Covid-19 Relief Unit
You have been chosen via E-mail for the United Nations Covid-19 Relief F und, for more details reply to sangior...@aclipisa.it Best regards, Dr. Susan Marshal

!!! Ask Details For Relief

2020-12-14 Thread United Nations Covid-19 Relief Unit
You has been chosen via E-mail for the United Nations Covid-19 Relief F und, for more details reply to sangior...@aclipisa.it Best regards, Dr. Susan Marshal

!!! Ask Details For Relief

2020-12-12 Thread United Nations Covid-19 Relief Unit
You has been chosen via E-mail for the United Nations Covid-19 Relief F und, for more details reply to sangior...@aclipisa.it Best regards, Dr. Susan Marshal

Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,smpctrl

2020-12-10 Thread Daniel Palmer
Hi Arnd, On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 02:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Daniel, please send patches on top of this series to address Rob's > comments. Will do. On the enabled method one I had a question for Rob so I'll wait for a reply to that and then send the fixes. Sorry about the trouble caused. Than

Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,smpctrl

2020-12-10 Thread Daniel Palmer
Hi Rob, On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 01:35, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:43:21PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > > This adds a YAML description of the smpctrl node needed by the > > platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs to boot secondary cpus. > > You need an 'enable-method'

Ask Details For Relief

2020-12-09 Thread U. N. Greetings
Your email has been selected for the United Nations Covid-19 Relief Fund, for more details kindly reply to sangior...@aclipisa.it Best regards, Dr. Susan Marshal

Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,smpctrl

2020-12-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:43:21PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > This adds a YAML description of the smpctrl node needed by the > platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs to boot secondary cpus. You need an 'enable-method' string defined too. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer > --- > ..

[tip: x86/misc] x86/msr: Add a pointer to an URL which contains further details

2020-12-08 Thread tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
Committer: Borislav Petkov CommitterDate: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:17:08 +01:00 x86/msr: Add a pointer to an URL which contains further details After having collected the majority of reports about MSRs being written by userspace tools and what tools those are, and all newer reports mostly repeating, add

I am Vice Chairman of Hang Seng Bank, I have Important Matter to Discuss with you concerning my late client. Died without a NEXT OF KIN. Send me your private email for full details inf

2020-12-07 Thread Dr Raymond Chien Hang Seng
E-Mail: dr2987...@gmail.com

!!!!! Ask Details For Relief

2020-12-06 Thread United Nations Covid-19 Relief Unit
You has been chosen via E-mail for the United Nations Covid-19 Relief F und, for more details reply to sangior...@aclipisa.it Best regards, Dr. Susan Marshal

!!!!! Ask Details For Relief

2020-12-05 Thread United Nations Covid-19 Relief Unit
You has been chosen via E-mail for the United Nations Covid-19 Relief F und, for more details reply to sangior...@aclipisa.it Best regards, Dr. Susan Marshal

[PATCH] x86/msr: Add a pointer to an URL which contains further details

2020-12-04 Thread Borislav Petkov
); + pr_warn("See https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/about for details.\n"); return 0; } -- 2.21.0

[PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,smpctrl

2020-12-01 Thread Daniel Palmer
This adds a YAML description of the smpctrl node needed by the platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs to boot secondary cpus. Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer --- .../bindings/arm/mstar/mstar,smpctrl.yaml | 40 +++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) create mode 100644 D

[PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,smpctrl

2020-11-30 Thread Daniel Palmer
This adds a YAML description of the smpctrl node needed by the platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs to boot secondary cpus. Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer --- .../bindings/arm/mstar/mstar,smpctrl.yaml | 38 +++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) create mode 100644 D

Re: [PATCH 4/9] regulator: da9121: Add device variant details and respective regmaps

2020-11-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:14:54PM +, Adam Ward wrote: > Add ability to probe device and validate configuration, then apply a regmap > configuration for a single or dual buck device accordingly. This looks like it might benefit from being multiple commits - "X then Y" type commit logs are oft

[PATCH 4/9] regulator: da9121: Add device variant details and respective regmaps

2020-11-20 Thread Adam Ward
Add ability to probe device and validate configuration, then apply a regmap configuration for a single or dual buck device accordingly. Signed-off-by: Adam Ward --- drivers/regulator/Kconfig| 14 +- drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.c | 382 +-- incl

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report

2020-11-19 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Am 19.11.20 um 01:17 schrieb Jonathan Corbet: On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:58:58 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: That's also why this commit removes scripts/ver_linux as well: the details it collects are only needed in some situations. And some (a lot?) distributions do not ship it anyway; a b

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report

2020-11-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:58:58 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > That's also why this commit removes scripts/ver_linux as well: the > details it collects are only needed in some situations. And some (a > lot?) distributions do not ship it anyway; a better, more modern script > wo

[RFC PATCH v2 05/26] docs: reporting-bugs: begin reference section providing details

2020-11-12 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Provide an introduction to the reference section that will provide more details how to report an issue. Mention a few general things here. Those are not strictly needed, but likely wise to write down somewhere. Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis --- v2: - mention https://jvns.ca/blog/good

[RFC PATCH v2 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report

2020-11-12 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
o the approach the old text used: it told people to always send contents of files like /proc/ioports or /proc/iomem, which in a lot of cases won't be needed and make reports unnecessarily big and hard to compile. That's also why this commit removes scripts/ver_linux as well: the details it co

[RFC PATCH v2 23/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details for issues specific to stable and longterm

2020-11-12 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
/reporting-bugs.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst @@ -1292,24 +1292,187 @@ easier. And with a bit of luck there might be someone in the team that knows a bit about programming and might be able to write a fix. +Details about reporting issues only occurring in older kern

[tip: core/mm] highmem: High implementation details and document API

2020-11-06 Thread tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Committer: Thomas Gleixner CommitterDate: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 23:14:59 +01:00 highmem: High implementation details and document API Move the gory details of kmap & al into a private header and only document the interfaces which are usable by drivers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linus Torv

Re: [PATCH v2] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation

2020-11-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Anand, On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:10:43 +1100 Anand K Mistry wrote: > > Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect > branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status. > > Signed-off-by: Anand K Mistry > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Remove underscores from field

[PATCH v2] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation

2020-11-05 Thread Anand K Mistry
Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status. Signed-off-by: Anand K Mistry --- Changes in v2: - Remove underscores from field name to workaround documentation issue Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 2 ++ f

Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation

2020-11-04 Thread Anand K. Mistry
On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 07:05, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:27:54 +1100 Anand K Mistry wrote: > > > Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect > > branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status. > > Why is this considered useful? For testing

Re: [patch V3 22/37] highmem: High implementation details and document API

2020-11-03 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, Nov 03 2020 at 09:48, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I have no complaints about the patch, but it strikes me that if people > want to actually have much better debug coverage, this is where it > should be (I like the "every other address" thing too, don't get me > wrong). > > In particular, instea

Re: [patch V3 22/37] highmem: High implementation details and document API

2020-11-03 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 2:33 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > +static inline void *kmap(struct page *page) > +{ > + void *addr; > + > + might_sleep(); > + if (!PageHighMem(page)) > + addr = page_address(page); > + else > + addr = kmap_high(page); > +

[patch V3 22/37] highmem: High implementation details and document API

2020-11-03 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Move the gory details of kmap & al into a private header and only document the interfaces which are usable by drivers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- V3: New patch --- include/linux/highmem-internal.h | 174 + include/linux/highmem.h |

Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation

2020-10-31 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:27:54 +1100 Anand K Mistry wrote: > Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect > branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status. Why is this considered useful?

[PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation

2020-10-29 Thread Anand K Mistry
Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status. Signed-off-by: Anand K Mistry --- Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 2 ++ fs/proc/array.c| 28 2 files changed, 3

RESPOND FOR DETAILS

2020-10-22 Thread LEO NATHAN
Dear,I am in the UK and very sick due to cancer, will die.want to distribute $10,000,000.00 via you my name is LEO NATHAN

Re: [PATCH] docs: lkdtm: Modernize and improve details

2020-10-21 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:45:59 -0700 Kees Cook wrote: > The details on using LKDTM were overly obscure. Modernize the details > and expand examples to better illustrate how to use the interfaces. > Additionally add missing SPDX header. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > --- >

TREAT AS URGENT/ REPLY FOR MORE DETAILS

2020-10-19 Thread Salif Musa
-- Hi friend I am a banker in ADB BANK. I want to transfer an abandoned sum of USD15.6Million to your Bank account. 40/percent will be your share. No risk involved but keeps it as secret. Contact me for more details. Please reply me through my alternative email id only (salif.musa

[PATCH] docs: lkdtm: Modernize and improve details

2020-10-15 Thread Kees Cook
The details on using LKDTM were overly obscure. Modernize the details and expand examples to better illustrate how to use the interfaces. Additionally add missing SPDX header. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- .../fault-injection/provoke-crashes.rst | 56 +++ 1 file changed, 33

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 23/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details for issues specific to stable and longterm

2020-10-11 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Am 09.10.20 um 20:42 schrieb Randy Dunlap: On 10/1/20 1:50 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Many thx for you comments, all suggestions implemented. Ciao, Thorsten

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 23/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details for issues specific to stable and longterm

2020-10-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
@@ with a bit of luck there might be someone in the > team that knows a bit about > programming and might be able to write a fix. > > > +Details about reporting issues only occurring in older kernel version lines > +----

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report

2020-10-09 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Many thx for you comments. Consider all the obvious spelling and grammatical mistakes you pointed out fixed, I won't mention all of them in this reply to keep things easier to follow. Am 09.10.20 um 04:45 schrieb Randy Dunlap: On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: + In both cases

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report

2020-10-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
hy this commit removes scripts/ver_linux as well: the > details it collects are only needed in some situations and make reports > bigger and harder to compile without good reason. Additionally, some > distributions do not ship it; a better, more modern script would likely > resist in t

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/26] docs: reporting-bugs: begin reference section providing details

2020-10-03 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Am 02.10.20 um 18:49 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Many thx for you comments, all suggestions implemented. Ciao, Thorsten

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/26] docs: reporting-bugs: begin reference section providing details

2020-10-02 Thread Randy Dunlap
Hi-- On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Provide an introduction to the reference section that will provide more > details how to report an issue. Mention a few general things here. Those > are not strictly needed, but likely wise to write down somewhere. > > Signed-o

[RFC PATCH v1 05/26] docs: reporting-bugs: begin reference section providing details

2020-10-01 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Provide an introduction to the reference section that will provide more details how to report an issue. Mention a few general things here. Those are not strictly needed, but likely wise to write down somewhere. Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis --- = RFC = Should we keep the links to https

[RFC PATCH v1 23/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details for issues specific to stable and longterm

2020-10-01 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst @@ -1223,24 +1223,191 @@ with a bit of luck there might be someone in the team that knows a bit about programming and might be able to write a fix. +Details about reporting issues only occurring in older kernel ver

[RFC PATCH v1 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report

2020-10-01 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
e old approach, which told people to always send contents of files like /proc/ioports or /proc/iomem, which in a lot of cases won't be needed and make reports unnecessarily big. That's also why this commit removes scripts/ver_linux as well: the details it collects are only needed in some

DETAILS

2020-09-12 Thread DONNA AND DAVID STICKLEY
FAMILY DONATION. GET BACK TO US FOR MORE DETAILS... donna.anddavid_stick...@outlook.com

[PATCH v2 05/10] soundwire: bus: update multi-link definition with hw sync details

2020-09-01 Thread Bard Liao
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Hardware-based synchronization is typically required when the bus->multi_link flag is set. On Intel platforms, when the Cadence IP is configured in 'Multi Master Mode', the hardware synchronization is required even when a stream only uses a single segment. The existing

Re: [PATCH 05/11] soundwire: bus: update multi-link definition with hw sync details

2020-08-28 Thread Vinod Koul
On 26-08-20, 09:09, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > + * @hw_sync_min_links: Number of links used by a stream above which > > > + * hardware-based synchronization is required. This value is only > > > + * meaningful if multi_link is set. If set to 1, hardware-based > > > + * synchronization

Re: [PATCH 05/11] soundwire: bus: update multi-link definition with hw sync details

2020-08-26 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
+ * @hw_sync_min_links: Number of links used by a stream above which + * hardware-based synchronization is required. This value is only + * meaningful if multi_link is set. If set to 1, hardware-based + * synchronization will be used even if a stream only uses a single + * SoundWire segment.

Re: [PATCH 05/11] soundwire: bus: update multi-link definition with hw sync details

2020-08-26 Thread Vinod Koul
On 18-08-20, 10:41, Bard Liao wrote: > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart > > Hardware-based synchronization is typically required when the > bus->multi_link flag is set. > > On Intel platforms, when the Cadence IP is configured in 'Multi Master > Mode', the hardware synchronization is required even whe

[PATCH 05/11] soundwire: bus: update multi-link definition with hw sync details

2020-08-18 Thread Bard Liao
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Hardware-based synchronization is typically required when the bus->multi_link flag is set. On Intel platforms, when the Cadence IP is configured in 'Multi Master Mode', the hardware synchronization is required even when a stream only uses a single segment. The existing

Get back to me for more details

2020-08-10 Thread Mrs. Maddalena Nicholaus
father which currently belongs to me. I want to hand it over to you for a charity project. feel free to get back to me for more details if you are interested. I wait for your urgent response. Regards, Mrs. Maddalena Nicholaus.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,pmsleep

2020-07-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 2:34 PM Daniel Palmer wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 21:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Does calling it "mstar,pmsleepv7" make more sense? I'm not sure what > > > to call it really. > > > > Use the name of the oldest chip you know that supports it in there, > > such as "

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,pmsleep

2020-07-29 Thread Daniel Palmer
Hi Arnd, On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 21:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Does calling it "mstar,pmsleepv7" make more sense? I'm not sure what > > to call it really. > > Use the name of the oldest chip you know that supports it in there, > such as "mstar,msc313-pmsleep" if this one is specific to msc313.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,pmsleep

2020-07-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:14 AM Daniel Palmer wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 04:18, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > +oneOf: > > > + - items: > > > + - enum: > > > + - mstar,pmsleep > > > > Needs to be SoC specific. Random collectio

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,pmsleep

2020-07-29 Thread Daniel Palmer
Hi Rob, On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 04:18, Rob Herring wrote: > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > +oneOf: > > + - items: > > + - enum: > > + - mstar,pmsleep > > Needs to be SoC specific. Random collections of bits are never > 'standard' from one SoC to the next. I do

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,pmsleep

2020-07-28 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 07:03:13PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > This adds a YAML description of the pmsleep node used by > MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer > --- > .../bindings/arm/mstar/mstar,pmsleep.yaml | 43 +++ > MAINTAINERS

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mstar: Add binding details for mstar, pmsleep

2020-07-28 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:03:13 +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > This adds a YAML description of the pmsleep node used by > MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer > --- > .../bindings/arm/mstar/mstar,pmsleep.yaml | 43 +++ > MAINTAINERS

[PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,pmsleep

2020-07-28 Thread Daniel Palmer
This adds a YAML description of the pmsleep node used by MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer --- .../bindings/arm/mstar/mstar,pmsleep.yaml | 43 +++ MAINTAINERS | 1 + 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 10064

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] driver core: Expose device link details in sysfs

2020-07-15 Thread Saravana Kannan
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:14 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:17:58PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > It's helpful to be able to look at device link details from sysfs. So, > > expose it in sysfs. > > > > Say device

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] driver core: Expose device link details in sysfs

2020-07-15 Thread Guenter Roeck
Hi, On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:17:58PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > It's helpful to be able to look at device link details from sysfs. So, > expose it in sysfs. > > Say device-A is supplier of device-B. These are the additional files > this patch would create: > >

[PATCH 04/10] sh: move ioremap_fixed details out of

2020-07-14 Thread Christoph Hellwig
ioremap_fixed is an internal implementation detail and should not be exposed to drivers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig --- arch/sh/include/asm/io.h | 16 arch/sh/mm/init.c | 1 + arch/sh/mm/ioremap.c | 1 + arch/sh/mm/ioremap.h | 23 ++

[PATCH v5 07/12] ARM: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,l3bridge

2020-07-10 Thread Daniel Palmer
This adds a YAML description of the l3bridge node needed by the platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer Reviewed-by: Rob Herring --- .../bindings/misc/mstar,l3bridge.yaml | 44 +++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 10064

Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] ARM: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,l3bridge

2020-07-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:15:20 +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > This adds a YAML description of the l3bridge node needed by the > platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer > --- > .../bindings/misc/mstar,l3bridge.yaml | 44 +++ > 1 file

[PATCH 04/10] sh: move ioremap_fixed details out of

2020-06-26 Thread Christoph Hellwig
ioremap_fixed is an internal implementation detail and should not be exposed to drivers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig --- arch/sh/include/asm/io.h | 16 arch/sh/mm/init.c | 1 + arch/sh/mm/ioremap.c | 1 + arch/sh/mm/ioremap.h | 23 ++

[PATCH v4 07/12] ARM: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,l3bridge

2020-06-16 Thread Daniel Palmer
This adds a YAML description of the l3bridge node needed by the platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer --- .../bindings/misc/mstar,l3bridge.yaml | 44 +++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree

Re: [PATCH v12 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

2020-06-15 Thread Vaibhav Jain
This accidently got reposted. Please ignore. Vaibhav Jain writes: > Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags > that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM > specification. > > Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: Michael Ellerman > Cc

[PATCH v13 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

2020-06-15 Thread Vaibhav Jain
Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM specification. Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Ira Weiny Acked-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: v12..v1

[PATCH v12 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

2020-06-15 Thread Vaibhav Jain
Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM specification. Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Ira Weiny Acked-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: v11..v1

[PATCH v3 07/12] ARM: mstar: Add binding details for mstar,l3bridge

2020-06-12 Thread Daniel Palmer
This adds a YAML description of the l3bridge node needed by the platform code for the MStar/SigmaStar Armv7 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer --- .../bindings/misc/mstar,l3bridge.yaml | 44 +++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree

[PATCH v12 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

2020-06-08 Thread Vaibhav Jain
Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM specification. Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Ira Weiny Acked-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: v11..v1

[PATCH v11 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

2020-06-07 Thread Vaibhav Jain
Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM specification. Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Ira Weiny Acked-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: v10..v1

[PATCH v10 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

2020-06-04 Thread Vaibhav Jain
Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM specification. Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Ira Weiny Acked-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: v9..v10

Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 1/5] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall

2020-06-02 Thread Ira Weiny
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:44:34PM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote: > Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags > that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM > specification. > > Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: Michael Ellerman > Cc: Ira We

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >