On 2021/3/30 15:27, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:57 AM Huang, Ying wrote:
>>
>> Yu Zhao writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:44 PM Huang, Ying wrote:
Miaohe Lin writes:
> On 2021/3/30 9:57, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Hi, Miaohe,
>>
>> Miaohe Lin wri
On 2021/3/30 11:44, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Miaohe Lin writes:
>
>> On 2021/3/30 9:57, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>> Hi, Miaohe,
>>>
>>> Miaohe Lin writes:
>>>
Hi all,
I am investigating the swap code, and I found the below possible race
window:
CPU 1
Yu Zhao writes:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:44 PM Huang, Ying wrote:
>>
>> Miaohe Lin writes:
>>
>> > On 2021/3/30 9:57, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> >> Hi, Miaohe,
>> >>
>> >> Miaohe Lin writes:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>> I am investigating the swap code, and I found the below possible race
>> >>>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:44 PM Huang, Ying wrote:
>
> Miaohe Lin writes:
>
> > On 2021/3/30 9:57, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Hi, Miaohe,
> >>
> >> Miaohe Lin writes:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> I am investigating the swap code, and I found the below possible race
> >>> window:
> >>>
> >>> CPU 1
Miaohe Lin writes:
> On 2021/3/30 9:57, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Hi, Miaohe,
>>
>> Miaohe Lin writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I am investigating the swap code, and I found the below possible race
>>> window:
>>>
>>> CPU 1 CPU 2
>>> -
On 2021/3/30 9:57, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Miaohe,
>
> Miaohe Lin writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I am investigating the swap code, and I found the below possible race window:
>>
>> CPU 1CPU 2
>> -
Hi, Miaohe,
Miaohe Lin writes:
> Hi all,
> I am investigating the swap code, and I found the below possible race window:
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
> - -
> do_swap_page
> skip swapcache case (synchrono
Hi all,
I am investigating the swap code, and I found the below possible race window:
CPU 1 CPU 2
- -
do_swap_page
skip swapcache case (synchronous swap_readpage)
alloc_page_vma
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:47 AM Vincent Pelletier wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Distro: https://raspi.debian.net/ (sid)
> Hardware: Raspberry Pi Zero W
> Kernel version: 5.9.11 (linux-image-5.9.0-4-rpi)
>
> To access a device connected to my pi, I need the spi0 bus, and would
> like to not be doing GPIO b
Ping ?
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 14:47:07 +, Vincent Pelletier
wrote:
> Distro: https://raspi.debian.net/ (sid)
> Hardware: Raspberry Pi Zero W
> Kernel version: 5.9.11 (linux-image-5.9.0-4-rpi)
>
> To access a device connected to my pi, I need the spi0 bus, and would
> like to not be doing GPIO
Hello,
Distro: https://raspi.debian.net/ (sid)
Hardware: Raspberry Pi Zero W
Kernel version: 5.9.11 (linux-image-5.9.0-4-rpi)
To access a device connected to my pi, I need the spi0 bus, and would
like to not be doing GPIO bit-banging when there are perfectly good
spi modules capable of using the
> -Original Message-
> From: 亿一
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2020 17:47
> To: Winkler, Tomas
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [BUG]is there a refcount leak in function mei_me_cl_rm_by_uuid?
Unfortunately you are correct, but currently it is very hard to
HI, all
When reviewing function mei_me_cl_rm_by_uuid， I notice that function
__mei_me_cl_by_uuid increases me_cl refcount
and function _mei_me_cl_del delete a list node with decrement me_cl
refcount , actually here cause a refcount leak as we haven't release
the refcount
by __mei_me_cl_by_uuid ?
s
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:15 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> (2) Set timer->expires to jiffies in del_timer() - but since there's nothing
> preventing the optimisation in __mod_timer() from occurring concurrently
> with del_timer(), this probably won't help.
Right. The "race" is fundamenta
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, David Howells wrote:
> Is there a race between the optimisation for networking code in __mod_timer()
> and del_timer() - or, at least, a race that matters?
>
> Consider:
>
> CPU A
David Howells wrote:
> I think it might just be best to put a note in the comments in __mod_timer().
How about the attached?
David
---
commit d538c734f9bf885292b88a81a06c5efee528d70d
Author: David Howells
Date: Wed Nov 8 10:20:27 2017 +
Add a comment into __mod_timer() noting a poss
Is there a race between the optimisation for networking code in __mod_timer()
and del_timer() - or, at least, a race that matters?
Consider:
CPU A CPU B
=== ===
[timer X is active
Looking to lose weight fast in a healthy way?
While it may be very tempting to turn to diet aid solutions that promise
awesome weight loss, it's also important to be cautious about your health.
Recent data show that most diet medicines, drinks and "organic" formulas are
capable of causing a range
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:52:31AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:57:27AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:33:18 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> > > Send again to correct addresses, sorry!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:26:52PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:57:41 +0900
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:46:34PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:33:18PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > O
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:46:34PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:33:18PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > I'm running some guest machines for kernel development. For debugging
> > > purpose, I use lots of
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:57:41 +0900
Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:46:34PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:33:18PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'm running some gues
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:46:34PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:33:18PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > I'm running some guest machines for kernel development. For debugging
> > > purpose, I use lots of
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:57:27AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:33:18 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Send again to correct addresses, sorry!
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm running some guest machin
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:33:18PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > I'm running some guest machines for kernel development. For debugging
> > purpose, I use lots of trace_printk() since it's faster than normal
> > printk(). When kernel crash h
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:33:18 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Send again to correct addresses, sorry!
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm running some guest machines for kernel development. For debugging
> > purpose, I use lots of trace_printk() since it'
Send again to correct addresses, sorry!
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running some guest machines for kernel development. For debugging
> purpose, I use lots of trace_printk() since it's faster than normal
> printk(). When kernel crash happens the trace b
hi kernel-developers _
from recent coverage of the LSFMM-Summit on LWN.net, i again got the impression
that there are performance- & behaviour - issues, that persistently don´t seem
to get resolved & stay around for the next summit. Additionally many things
come to light at such meetings of d
Hi Steven, thanks for your reply!
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:42:54 +0900
> Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Trace events can be enabled through debugfs by e.g. writing '1' into
>> their enable node. This is a very useful feature
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:42:54 +0900
Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Trace events can be enabled through debugfs by e.g. writing '1' into
> their enable node. This is a very useful feature as some tracing
> functions can introduce overhead and we only want them active when
> needed.
>
Hi everyone,
Trace events can be enabled through debugfs by e.g. writing '1' into
their enable node. This is a very useful feature as some tracing
functions can introduce overhead and we only want them active when
needed.
There is one additional thing that I would need though, which is to be
noti
Hi Peter,
On 24/06/13 14:53, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 06/24/2013 04:27 AM, Dean Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
Using the Linux v3.9 tag, I note that
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/net/slip/slip.c
net...@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
There s
On 06/24/2013 04:27 AM, Dean Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
Using the Linux v3.9 tag, I note that
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/net/slip/slip.c
net...@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
There seems to be no maintainer for drivers/net/slip/slip.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Dean Jenkins wrote:
> Using the Linux v3.9 tag, I note that
>
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/net/slip/slip.c
> net...@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
>
> There seems to be no maintainer for driver
Hi,
Using the Linux v3.9 tag, I note that
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/net/slip/slip.c
net...@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
There seems to be no maintainer for drivers/net/slip/slip.c, is that true ?
I am asking because sl_enc
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, rzryyvzy wrote:
> I know that tmpfs is a memmory filesystem. Is there a possibility to
> create also a memory block device?
> Is there a possibility to create for example a 1 GB memory block device
> (from the RAM)?
There are the /dev/ram* devices, created th
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:53:36 +0100, rzryyvzy said:
> I know that tmpfs is a memmory filesystem. Is there a possibility to create
> also a memory block device?
> Is there a possibility to create for example a 1 GB memory block device (from
> the RAM)?
A better question would be:
I know that tmpfs is a memmory filesystem. Is there a possibility to create
also a memory block device?
Is there a possibility to create for example a 1 GB memory block device (from
the RAM)?
--
E-Mail sent with anti-spam site TrashMail.net!
Free disposable email addresses: http
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Feb 14 2008 10:46, Andi Kleen wrote:
Jasper Bryant-Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This could be done fairly trivially with FUSE, and IMHO is a good use
for FUSE because since you're just throwing most data away, performance
is not a concern.
There is a much more i
Hans-Jürgen Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> schrieb Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> There is a much more interesting 'problem' with a "/dev/null
>> directory".
>>
>> Q: Why would you need such a directory?
>> A: To temporarily fool a program into believing it wrote something.
>>
>> Q: S
rzryyvzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /dev/null is often very useful, specially if programs force to save data in
> some file. But some programs like to creates different temporary file names,
> so /dev/null could no more work.
>
> What is with a "/dev/null"-directory?
> I mean a "blackhole pseud
Am Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:23:37 +0100 (CET)
schrieb Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Feb 14 2008 16:19, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> >>
> >> Q: What if a program attempts to mkdir /dev/nullmnt/foo to just
> >>create a file /dev/nullmnt/foo/barfile?
> >> A: /dev/nullmnt/foo must continue
On Feb 14 2008 16:19, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
>>
>> Q: What if a program attempts to mkdir /dev/nullmnt/foo to just
>>create a file /dev/nullmnt/foo/barfile?
>> A: /dev/nullmnt/foo must continue to exist or be accepted for a while,
>>or perhaps for eternity.
>
>Well, the problem seems to
Am Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:00:06 +0100 (CET)
schrieb Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Feb 14 2008 10:46, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >Jasper Bryant-Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> This could be done fairly trivially with FUSE, and IMHO is a good
> >> use for FUSE because since you're j
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Mika Lawando wrote:
> Jasper Bryant-Greene schrieb:
>> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 10:30 +0100, rzryyvzy wrote:
>>
>>> /dev/null is often very useful, specially if programs force to save data in
>>> some file. But some programs like to creates different temporary file
>>> names,
On Feb 14 2008 10:46, Andi Kleen wrote:
>Jasper Bryant-Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> This could be done fairly trivially with FUSE, and IMHO is a good use
>> for FUSE because since you're just throwing most data away, performance
>> is not a concern.
There is a much more interesting 'p
Jasper Bryant-Greene schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 10:30 +0100, rzryyvzy wrote:
/dev/null is often very useful, specially if programs force to save data in
some file. But some programs like to creates different temporary file names, so
/dev/null could no more work.
What is with a "/dev/nu
Tom Van Looy schrieb:
You can create a symlink to /dev/null and name it whatever you want?
$ ln -s /dev/null tempfile
$ echo blablabla > tempfile
$ wc tempfile
0 tempfile
The problem is, what do you do if the filename would be:
tempfile.
where is replaced by the unix timestamp. I mean how
Jasper Bryant-Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> This could be done fairly trivially with FUSE, and IMHO is a good use
> for FUSE because since you're just throwing most data away, performance
> is not a concern.
Q.: how much work would fuse have to do until the user file system
server could d
>Aan: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Onderwerp: Is there a "blackhole" /dev/null directory?
>
>Hello Linux Kernel Hackers,
>
>/dev/null is often very useful, specially if programs force to save data in
>some file. But some programs like to creates different temporary fi
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 10:30 +0100, rzryyvzy wrote:
> /dev/null is often very useful, specially if programs force to save data in
> some file. But some programs like to creates different temporary file names,
> so /dev/null could no more work.
>
> What is with a "/dev/null"-directory?
> I mean a
Hello Linux Kernel Hackers,
/dev/null is often very useful, specially if programs force to save data in
some file. But some programs like to creates different temporary file names, so
/dev/null could no more work.
What is with a "/dev/null"-directory?
I mean a "blackhole pseudo directory"
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:53:48 +0800 jidong xiao wrote:
> and how to subscribe it?
>
> Thanks
> Jason Xiao
It's all here:
http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-serial
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: s
and how to subscribe it?
Thanks
Jason Xiao
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> The JVM is very very bad from a C language point of view. You can convert C
> code to it and there have been some very experimental demos of this. However
> it is a very non trivial pro
> I 've tested the User Mode Linux a few times ago, and it gave me an
> idea: given the fact that we had a GCC which
> produce bytecode from C, it would be possible to produce a port of
> linux(a new directory "jvm" in the arch dir) which
> would run in a Java Virtual Machine. (after some inquir
>I 've tested the User Mode Linux a few times ago, and it gave me an
>idea: given the fact that we had a GCC which
>produce bytecode from C, it would be possible to produce a port of
>linux(a new directory "jvm" in the arch dir) which
>would run in a Java Virtual Machine. (after some inquiries
I 've tested the User Mode Linux a few times ago, and it gave me an
idea: given the fact that we had a GCC which
produce bytecode from C, it would be possible to produce a port of
linux(a new directory "jvm" in the arch dir) which
would run in a Java Virtual Machine. (after some inquiries such c
On Wednesday June 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I might just do that first step (find_ino) and offer it as as an
> experimental patch to the growing number of people who have asked for
> nfs exporting of FAT filesystems, and see how reliable it is in
> practice.
Following is a patch against 2
On Tuesday June 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> >Call fat_iget(i_location).
> > If this finds something, check i_logstart.
> > If it matches, assume SUCCESS.
> >
> >Then comes the tricky bit: read the directory entry
> > indic
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
>Call fat_iget(i_location).
> If this finds something, check i_logstart.
> If it matches, assume SUCCESS.
>
>Then comes the tricky bit: read the directory entry
> indicated by i_location, check the i_logstart is right,
> if it is
On Tuesday June 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi. I seem to remember that at one time in the 2.2 series I was able
> to to export fat32 file systems using nfs, but now it doesn't work
> anymore.
No, it doesn't.
It did in early 2.2 due to some fairly ugly hacks which just had to
go. They work
Hi. I seem to remember that at one time in the 2.2 series I was able
to to export fat32 file systems using nfs, but now it doesn't work
anymore.
If I remember correctly, I get "get: operation not permitted" when
trying to export the directory in question.
I am using 2.4.5.
Any assistance woul
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:21:14AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> A program may know its own access pattern, but it don't usually know
> future access patterns. Well, backing up the entire fs could benefit
> from a something like this, you probably won't need the backup again
> soon. But this is
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Jeremy Jackson wrote:
>
> > currently all the kernel's heuristics are feed-back control loops.
> > what you are asking for is a feed-forward system: a way for the application
> > to tell kernel "I'm only reading this once, so after I'm done, throw it out
> > straight away"
Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> currently all the kernel's heuristics are feed-back control loops.
> what you are asking for is a feed-forward system: a way for the application
> to tell kernel "I'm only reading this once, so after I'm done, throw it out
> straight away"
> and "I'm only writing this data
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:21:46AM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> [..] If we assume the caching isn't helping [..]
If you know kernel data cache doesn't help your workload at all then you want
use O_DIRECT at least to save the CPU. You can run 2.4.4pre3aa3 or apply the
rawio-3 patch
ond) that avoiding a ferw primary
cache misses per IO isn't likely to make any measurable difference.
DS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurent
Chavet
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:21 AM
To: David Schwartz
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bjorn Wesen wrote:
> A similar phenomenon happens when you simply copy a file - file A is read
> into the cache and file B is written to the cache, until the memory runs
> out. Then both start to flush at the same time, creating a horrible
in this example only file B needs uses IO when being flu
A similar phenomenon happens when you simply copy a file - file A is read
into the cache and file B is written to the cache, until the memory runs
out. Then both start to flush at the same time, creating a horrible
performance hit (especially if A and B are on the same disk :)
I don't know a way
> Is there a way to turn file caching off, or at least limit its size ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laurent Chavet
What benefit do you think you would get by limiting its size? All that
would do is ensure you hit the cache thrashing point sooner.
DS
-
To unsubscribe from
system time (more
than a CPU) used by bdflush and kswapd (and some others like kupdated).
Of course my real application doesn't go from /dev/zero to file but it
still only does sequential access, and it seems that I pay a high price
for the file caching when I'm not using it at all.
Torrey Hoffman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Here's an lspci -v dump. The machine is a set top box, pretty much a
> standard PC, but with hardware parts that are rarely seen in normal
> desktops. (The graphics card, ethernet card, and MPEG decoder chip
> all required non-standard Linux and X 4.0
Bill Nottingham said:
>Torrey Hoffman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
>> Does anyone know of a driver for the Crystal 4299 sound chip?
>
>It's not something there's one particular sound driver for (it's just
>an ac97 codec chip, as you saw). Most likely you want to use something
>like the i810_audio
Torrey Hoffman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Does anyone know of a driver for the Crystal 4299 sound chip?
It's not something there's one particular sound driver for (it's just
an ac97 codec chip, as you saw). Most likely you want to use something
like the i810_audio or via82cxxx_audio drivers. Wh
Does anyone know of a driver for the Crystal 4299 sound chip?
I grepped through /drivers/sound in both 2.2.18 and 2.4.0.
The only hints were that "ac97_codec.c" has two codec id's listed for it.
>From old changelogs I see that Mulder Tjeerd was involved in adding those...
perhaps he is writing
Hi,
Is there a devfs patch for 2.2.18 or how do I
get devfs to work with 2.2.18?
Tri
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Remember, Linux uses
> Posix (although we don't SAY posix much because that's
> another trademark and nobody jumps through the hoops
> to re-test each new conbination of kernel version X
> with utility set Y).
POSIX is not a trademark. The name refers to
> I am not sure it is a big deal. If you read the
> comment it was more of an off-the-cuff remark.
>
> I doubt anyone would testify in court that McNealy
> said this. The only way it is something to worry
> about is if they used it in a printed format (IANAL)
Law isn't an all-or-nothing thing.
--- Dana Lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think he did that at all :
> (Devil's Advocate time :)
Always a fun occupation. :)
> What he did was say that, while everyone was looking
> at Linux as the solution to modern computing
> problems,
> he didn't need to : he already has Solaris.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been
> calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux.
> Trademark violation time.
Yeah... isn't he a moron :)
> Assuming the quote is accurate (which, bei
Rob Landley wrote :
> Sun feels that their core product, Solaris, is
> threatened by Linux. They have several options:
> A) Jump on board and use Linux on their hardware.
> B) Improve Solaris until it can compete on its own
> merits.
> C) Market Solaris better, to make people want Solaris
> inst
--- Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, that's Scooter (all the Sun old timers call him
> Scooter, I dunno where
> it came from, I wasn't enough of an old timer).
> And, yeah, he does a lot
> of marketing. But in many respects, he's the
> perfect CEO. He's always
> out in public, pu
--- Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Rob Landley wrote:
> > >people just don't get it, do you? All Linux
> > >applications run on Solaris, which is our
> > >implementation of Linux. Now ask the question
> again,"
>
> I wouldn't worry about this. It's only a quest
--- "Jon 'maddog' Hall, Executive Director, Linux
International" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Warning: Highly controversial topic ahead.
> Messenger does not want to be shot]
Aw come on, it's traditional. :)
> This does bring up an interesting situation.
>
> The Linux community keeps saying t
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:15:41PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:54:21PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been
> > > > calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux.
> > > > Trademark violation time.
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:54:21PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> >
> > > Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been
> > > calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux.
> > > Trademark violation time.
> >
> > It's probably a marketing guy that has no idea about what he is talk
> > >When asked by a reporter why Sun's new clustering
> > >software was restricted to Solaris and not available
> > >on Linux, McNealy's aggravation seemed to peak. "You
> > >people just don't get it, do you? All Linux
> > >applications run on Solaris, which is our
> > >implementation of Lin
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:54:21PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
> > Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been
> > calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux.
> > Trademark violation time.
>
> It's probably a marketing guy that has no idea about what he is talking
> about. I'
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Rob Landley wrote:
> Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been
> calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux.
> Trademark violation time.
>
> The article's here:
>
> http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-14-020-04-NW-CY
>
> Quick quote:
>
> >W
[Warning: Highly controversial topic ahead. Messenger does not want to be shot]
This does bring up an interesting situation.
The Linux community keeps saying that "Linux is a re-implementation of Unix."
This gets X/Open all pissed off at us, because Linux has not passed the
qualification test
> Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been
> calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux.
> Trademark violation time.
It's probably a marketing guy that has no idea about what he is talking
about. I've seen good Linux related stuff come from Sun and I hardly can
imagine that suc
Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been
calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux.
Trademark violation time.
The article's here:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-14-020-04-NW-CY
Quick quote:
>When asked by a reporter why Sun's new clustering
>software was
Is there?
If not, I think there may be a need for one, and I will start it.
-- Andy
Andrew Grover
Intel/TRL/MAL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read th
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Philipp Rumpf wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:32:35PM +0300, Petko Manolov wrote:
> > It is not so difficult as it looks.
>
> I don't see it being difficult at all ...
>
> > The master pgd looking as:
> >
> > .org 0x1000
> > ENTRY(swapper_pg_dir)
> > .long 0x001
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:32:35PM +0300, Petko Manolov wrote:
> It is not so difficult as it looks.
I don't see it being difficult at all ...
> The master pgd looking as:
>
> .org 0x1000
> ENTRY(swapper_pg_dir)
> .long 0x00102007
> .long 0x00103007
> .fill BOOT_USER_PGD
It is not so difficult as it looks.
The master pgd looking as:
.org 0x1000
ENTRY(swapper_pg_dir)
.long 0x00102007
.long 0x00103007
.fill BOOT_USER_PGD_PTRS-2,4,0
/* default: 766 entries */
.long 0x00102007
.long 0x00103007
/* default: 254 en
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Petko Manolov wrote:
> Philipp Rumpf wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I put a simple construct in kernel/sched.c like this:
> > >
> > > struct runq_log_s {
> > > char comm[16];
> > > int pid
Philipp Rumpf wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I put a simple construct in kernel/sched.c like this:
> >
> > struct runq_log_s {
> > char comm[16];
> > int pid;
> > } runq_log[1024*1024];
> >
> > and the kernel didn't boo
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I put a simple construct in kernel/sched.c like this:
>
> struct runq_log_s {
> char comm[16];
> int pid;
> } runq_log[1024*1024];
>
> and the kernel didn't boot. Yes, I understand it is 20M of bss - so
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
