Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering)

2000-09-20 Thread Barry K. Nathan
> "Barry K. Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux > > 2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of > > testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next... > > That so? Must get Linus an Alpha or SPAR

Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering)

2000-09-20 Thread Horst von Brand
"Barry K. Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux > 2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of > testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next... That so? Must get Linus an Alpha or SPARC64 ASA

Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering)

2000-09-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:26:44PM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > > to see 2.3.1xx like we did with 2.1. But the 2.2.0-testX patches seemed like > > small stuff (maybe my memory just sucks tho). > > I don't think there ever were any 2.2.0-testX patches - my recollection is > that we went from 2

Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering)

2000-09-19 Thread Barry K. Nathan
> to see 2.3.1xx like we did with 2.1. But the 2.2.0-testX patches seemed like > small stuff (maybe my memory just sucks tho). I don't think there ever were any 2.2.0-testX patches - my recollection is that we went from 2.1.1xx to 2.2.0-preX, with no -testX in between like we seem to be having n