Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3 and isdn mppp

2005-02-13 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 04:50:23PM +, Christian Heim wrote: > Well, i have to setup ISDN here at home, and wanted to use both channels. > I am able to add the second channel, but then the kernel (at least i think) > starts to complain. > > >17:36:22 kraftwerk Badness in local_bh_enable at

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3 and isdn mppp

2005-02-13 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 04:50:23PM +, Christian Heim wrote: Well, i have to setup ISDN here at home, and wanted to use both channels. I am able to add the second channel, but then the kernel (at least i think) starts to complain. 17:36:22 kraftwerk Badness in local_bh_enable at

linux-2.6.11-rc3 and isdn mppp

2005-02-12 Thread Christian Heim
Well, i have to setup ISDN here at home, and wanted to use both channels. I am able to add the second channel, but then the kernel (at least i think) starts to complain. >17:36:22 kraftwerk Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 >17:36:22 kraftwerk [] local_bh_enable+0x71/0x80

linux-2.6.11-rc3 and isdn mppp

2005-02-12 Thread Christian Heim
Well, i have to setup ISDN here at home, and wanted to use both channels. I am able to add the second channel, but then the kernel (at least i think) starts to complain. 17:36:22 kraftwerk Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 17:36:22 kraftwerk [c011b201] local_bh_enable+0x71/0x80

JBD problems in linux 2.6.11 rc3

2005-02-09 Thread Peter Chubb
On a 12-way IA64, with ext3 filesystem on an Ramdisk, when attempting to run the disk I/O load of OSDL's aim-7 benchmark, I see an oops when the multiprogramming level reaches around 200. Turning on CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG shows: Assertion failure in __journal_file_buffer() at

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-09 Thread Stefan Seyfried
aurelien francillon wrote: > CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y This one is also bad for you. If you unset this, it will even run fast even without the object cache (i'm recompiling right now with object cache _and_ unset debug to see what i can gain from this :-) Maybe a patch like the attached one for the

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-09 Thread Stefan Seyfried
aurelien francillon wrote: CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y This one is also bad for you. If you unset this, it will even run fast even without the object cache (i'm recompiling right now with object cache _and_ unset debug to see what i can gain from this :-) Maybe a patch like the attached one for the

JBD problems in linux 2.6.11 rc3

2005-02-09 Thread Peter Chubb
On a 12-way IA64, with ext3 filesystem on an Ramdisk, when attempting to run the disk I/O load of OSDL's aim-7 benchmark, I see an oops when the multiprogramming level reaches around 200. Turning on CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG shows: Assertion failure in __journal_file_buffer() at

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-08 Thread Aurélien Francillon
Stefan Seyfried wrote: aurelien francillon wrote: hi, since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks up the computer, time gives: cat /proc

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-08 Thread Stefan Seyfried
aurelien francillon wrote: > hi, > since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there > seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : > reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks > up the computer, time gives: > cat

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-08 Thread Anders Saaby
On Monday 07 February 2005 17:56, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: > Anders Saaby wrote: > >Is this system running SMP og UP? > > UP Ouch OK. Then I at least haven't seen it before. -- Med venlig hilsen - Best regards - Meilleures salutations Anders Saaby Systems Engineer

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-08 Thread Anders Saaby
On Monday 07 February 2005 17:56, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: Anders Saaby wrote: Is this system running SMP og UP? UP Ouch OK. Then I at least haven't seen it before. -- Med venlig hilsen - Best regards - Meilleures salutations Anders Saaby Systems Engineer

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-08 Thread Stefan Seyfried
aurelien francillon wrote: hi, since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks up the computer, time gives: cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-08 Thread Aurélien Francillon
Stefan Seyfried wrote: aurelien francillon wrote: hi, since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks up the computer, time gives: cat /proc

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread SATOH Fumiyasu
There are some corrections for my message... Sorry. At Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:53:29 +0900, SATOH Fumiyasu wrote: > Host3: > -- > OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing version (sarge) > Kernel: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp > (compiled by gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-6)) > Filesystem: /

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread SATOH Fumiyasu
At Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:38:28 -0600, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: > I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you > need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em > ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related; ide-smart shows all fine. > > From

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread Jeffrey E. Hundstad
Anders Saaby wrote: Is this system running SMP og UP? On Monday 07 February 2005 16:38, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em ASAP. I don't believe this is

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread Anders Saaby
Is this system running SMP og UP? On Monday 07 February 2005 16:38, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: > I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you > need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em > ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related;

linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread Jeffrey E. Hundstad
I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related; ide-smart shows all fine. From dmesg: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 8388608 dir: inode 117526252 Filesystem "hda4":

[BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-07 Thread aurelien francillon
hi, since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks up the computer, time gives: cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info 0.00s user 6.76s system 12030

[BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-07 Thread aurelien francillon
hi, since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks up the computer, time gives: cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info 0.00s user 6.76s system 12030

linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread Jeffrey E. Hundstad
I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related; ide-smart shows all fine. From dmesg: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 8388608 dir: inode 117526252 Filesystem hda4:

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread Anders Saaby
Is this system running SMP og UP? On Monday 07 February 2005 16:38, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related;

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread Jeffrey E. Hundstad
Anders Saaby wrote: Is this system running SMP og UP? On Monday 07 February 2005 16:38, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em ASAP. I don't believe this is

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread SATOH Fumiyasu
At Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:38:28 -0600, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: I'm sorry for this truncated report... but it's all I've got. If you need .config or system configuration, etc. let me know and I'll send'em ASAP. I don't believe this is hardware related; ide-smart shows all fine. From

Re: linux-2.6.11-rc3: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c.

2005-02-07 Thread SATOH Fumiyasu
There are some corrections for my message... Sorry. At Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:53:29 +0900, SATOH Fumiyasu wrote: Host3: -- OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing version (sarge) Kernel: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp (compiled by gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-6)) Filesystem: / (/dev/md0

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-04 Thread Mickael Marchand
sadely. I have the same problem, but on x86, the attached patch fixed it for me. --- linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c @@ -545,19 +553,21 @@ int rc; memset(buf

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-04 Thread Guillaume Chazarain
-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c @@ -545,19 +553,21 @@ int rc; memset(buf,0,sizeof(buf)); + tda9887_set_tvnorm(t,buf); buf[1] |= cOutputPort1Inactive; buf[1] |= cOutputPort2Inactive; - tda9887_set_tvnorm(t,buf); if (UNSET != t

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-04 Thread Guillaume Chazarain
-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c @@ -545,19 +553,21 @@ int rc; memset(buf,0,sizeof(buf)); + tda9887_set_tvnorm(t,buf); buf[1] |= cOutputPort1Inactive; buf[1] |= cOutputPort2Inactive; - tda9887_set_tvnorm(t,buf); if (UNSET != t

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-04 Thread Mickael Marchand
sadely. I have the same problem, but on x86, the attached patch fixed it for me. --- linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c @@ -545,19 +553,21 @@ int rc; memset(buf

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Mickael Marchand
Hello, I am having the same kind of troubles (can't tune and mt_set_frequency -121 errors) since 2.6.10 (it was working in 2.6.9) on amd64. this patch did not help sadely. log files attached if you have time to look at them :) (the non-working one being 2.6.11-rc3+your patch) Cheers, Mik Gerd

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 12:30 +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: > Thanks, seems to be a initialization order bug which changes the default > state of the tda9887 output ports. The patch below should fix that. Everything is working fine now. Thank you. __ Markus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Gerd Knorr
> > > mt2032_set_if_freq failed with -121 > > OK here you go. Thanks, seems to be a initialization order bug which changes the default state of the tda9887 output ports. The patch below should fix that. Gerd diff -u linux-2.6.11/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 11:17 +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > tuner: chip found at addr 0xc0 i2c-bus bt878 #0 [sw] > > tuner: type set to 33 (MT20xx universal) by bt878 #0 [sw] > > tuner: microtune: companycode=4d54 part=04 rev=04 > > tuner: microtune MT2032 found, OK > > tda9885/6/7: chip found @

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Gerd Knorr
Markus Trippelsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tuner: chip found at addr 0xc0 i2c-bus bt878 #0 [sw] > tuner: type set to 33 (MT20xx universal) by bt878 #0 [sw] > tuner: microtune: companycode=4d54 part=04 rev=04 > tuner: microtune MT2032 found, OK > tda9885/6/7: chip found @ 0x86 > ... >

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Gerd Knorr
Markus Trippelsdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tuner: chip found at addr 0xc0 i2c-bus bt878 #0 [sw] tuner: type set to 33 (MT20xx universal) by bt878 #0 [sw] tuner: microtune: companycode=4d54 part=04 rev=04 tuner: microtune MT2032 found, OK tda9885/6/7: chip found @ 0x86 ...

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 11:17 +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: tuner: chip found at addr 0xc0 i2c-bus bt878 #0 [sw] tuner: type set to 33 (MT20xx universal) by bt878 #0 [sw] tuner: microtune: companycode=4d54 part=04 rev=04 tuner: microtune MT2032 found, OK tda9885/6/7: chip found @ 0x86 ...

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Gerd Knorr
mt2032_set_if_freq failed with -121 OK here you go. Thanks, seems to be a initialization order bug which changes the default state of the tda9887 output ports. The patch below should fix that. Gerd diff -u linux-2.6.11/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c linux/drivers/media/video/tda9887.c

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 12:30 +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote: Thanks, seems to be a initialization order bug which changes the default state of the tda9887 output ports. The patch below should fix that. Everything is working fine now. Thank you. __ Markus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-03 Thread Mickael Marchand
Hello, I am having the same kind of troubles (can't tune and mt_set_frequency -121 errors) since 2.6.10 (it was working in 2.6.9) on amd64. this patch did not help sadely. log files attached if you have time to look at them :) (the non-working one being 2.6.11-rc3+your patch) Cheers, Mik Gerd

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-02 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:35 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'd _really_ like to calm down for a final 2.6.11 now, so please note > anything really important I missed, but keep the rest pending. And give > this a good testing.. ... > Gerd Knorr: > o video/arv: remove casts > o video/w9966:

Linux 2.6.11-rc3

2005-02-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
Add 'f_maxcount' to allow filesystems to set a per-file maximum IO size o Fix permissions on drivers/scsi/a100u2w.c o Linux 2.6.11-rc3 Manish Lachwani: o kobject build fix Marc Singer: o [ARM PATCH] 2442/1: Simplifying NODES_SHIFT Marcel Holtmann: o [Bluetooth] Use wait_event_interrupt

Linux 2.6.11-rc3

2005-02-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
/a100u2w.c o Linux 2.6.11-rc3 Manish Lachwani: o kobject build fix Marc Singer: o [ARM PATCH] 2442/1: Simplifying NODES_SHIFT Marcel Holtmann: o [Bluetooth] Use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() o [Bluetooth] Use wait_event_timeout() o [Bluetooth] Fix too many keys pressed error o

Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc3 - BT848 no signal

2005-02-02 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:35 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: I'd _really_ like to calm down for a final 2.6.11 now, so please note anything really important I missed, but keep the rest pending. And give this a good testing.. ... Gerd Knorr: o video/arv: remove casts o video/w9966: remove