On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:02:29AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> If you want to apply this one first, that's fine by me.
Thanks, I'll route it through the EDAC tree.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 14:58 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:17:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. I don't have a box to test, so I can't take on this driver. But
> > leaving
> > it in tree for a while longer doesn't hurt (much ... it seems to get a
> > tree
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:17:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Agreed. I don't have a box to test, so I can't take on this driver. But
> leaving
> it in tree for a while longer doesn't hurt (much ... it seems to get a
> tree-wide
> cleanup patch about once a year ... which doesn't sound like a cr
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 17:19 +0200, Anders Larsen wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2016-08-24 16:33 Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> > sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> > obsolete or unmaintained.
> Whereas I agree it's helpful to pu
On Wednesday, 2016-08-24 16:33 Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
Whereas I agree it's helpful to purge dysfunctional adresses...
> These M: entries in MAINTAINER
On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 22:31 -0400, Mark F. Brown wrote:
> I've continued to author patches for the Linux kernel, but they have been
> under my work email address. This email works but I do not monitor it very
> often anymore.
So should the MAINTAINERS address be changed ?
>> Maybe mark it Obsolete or Orphan.
>
> Yap, let's mark it Orphan and remove Jason Uhlenkott's email address. I
> wouldn't go as far as removing it just yet especially if it doesn't cost
> us anything to have it in there and someone might have a box with the
> hardware somewhere...
Agreed. I don
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:50:12PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Maybe mark it Obsolete or Orphan.
Yap, let's mark it Orphan and remove Jason Uhlenkott's email address. I
wouldn't go as far as removing it just yet especially if it doesn't cost
us anything to have it in there and someone might have a
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 15:34 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 07:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many sections in
> > MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either obsolete or unmaintained.
> ...
> > juhle...@akamai.com
> So I can confirm
On 08/24/2016 07:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
sections in
MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
obsolete or unmaintained.
...
juhle...@akamai.com
Hi Joe,
So I can confirm that he is no longer here, and as far
as I know is not in
On 08/24/2016 04:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections would make MAINTAINERS and ge
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:56 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 04:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> > sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> > obsolete or unmaintained.
> >
> > Marking these sections app
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections would make MAINTAINE
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 16:58 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:33:45PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> > sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> > obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> > secur...@kernel.org
> Yo
We can change mine from sfre...@samba.org to smbfre...@gmail.com since
Samba.org email is more awkward to get that gmail these days (I read it
less often) and I use a non-Samba.org email for my commits.
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:33:45PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
> secur...@kernel.org
You are kidding, right?
>
> The email addresses below are also bcc'd here to see what bounces.
> The list of the bounces will be collected.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> aacr...@adaptec.com
> aacr...@microsemi.com
Hi Joe,
aacr...@microsemi.com is a mailing list, and is valid. I thought I had changed
aacr...@adaptec.com, but mus
Hi Joe,
Em Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:33:45 -0700
Joe Perches escreveu:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections woul
Hi Joe,
I would suggest that those addresses which bounce should certainly be
removed, but the rest should be left alone.
Kind regards,
Tigran
PS. Joe, sorry if you received this message twice --- my first attempt
to reply failed because gmail used html by default :)
On 25 August 2016 at 00:33,
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 11:00 +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> I would suggest that those addresses which bounce should certainly be
> removed, but the rest should be left alone.
That's the plan.
Here's the current bounce list:
andrew.d.henr...@intel.com
brucech...@via.com.tw
dmitry.tarnya...@lockl
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 21:02 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> I get these emails, but have not received any patches worth acking in 3+
> years. Obviously, the code I am ostensibly maintaining has proven to be
> absolutely perfect in every way :-)
Hey Linas
I guess you could change the S: status line
Hi Joe,
The address "support.opensou...@diasemi.com" works. Thanks.
On 25 August 2016 00:34 Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
[...]
> The email addresses below a
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 17:17 -0700, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Petr.
> I (p...@vandrovec.name) am "maintainer" of ncpfs. As NetWare is dead for
> decade or so, there are no new users, and so no new bugs are found, and no
> new features needs to be added. And so no checkins are needed.
No wor
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:33:45 -0700
Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
> ali...@web.de
Hi Joe!
Been using this email address as my main address for nearly 17 year
Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
sections in
MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
obsolete or unmaintained.
Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
sections would make MAINTAINERS and get_maintainer.pl more
useful.
These M: entries in MAINTAI
> Am 24.08.2016 um 19:33 schrieb Joe Perches :
>
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections would make MAINTAINE
26 matches
Mail list logo
