hi,
On Jan 5, 3:51pm, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Subject: Re: More better in mount(2)
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > ...
> > > This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
> > > strtok
hi,
On Jan 5, 3:51pm, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Subject: Re: More better in mount(2)
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
...
This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do man strtok
Daniel writes:
> [re strtok for mount option parsing]
>
> BUGSNever use this function. If you do, note that:
> This function modifies its first argument.
> The identity of the delimiting character is lost.
> This functions cannot be used on
Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > ...
> > This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
> > strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do man strtok and read the
> > 'Bugs' section.)
> >
> > It would be worth thinking about how to do
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote:
...
This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses
strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do man strtok and read the
'Bugs' section.)
It would be worth thinking about how to do this better.
5 matches
Mail list logo