Re: Ordering of commits and breaking bisecting

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:38:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Can we be a bit more careful with the ordering of commits, please? > Commit d22a6966b8029913fac37d078ab2403898d94c63 (iommu sg merging: add > accessors for segment_boundary_mask in device_dma_parameters())

Ordering of commits and breaking bisecting

Hi all, Can we be a bit more careful with the ordering of commits, please? Commit d22a6966b8029913fac37d078ab2403898d94c63 (iommu sg merging: add accessors for segment_boundary_mask in device_dma_parameters()) introduces the dma_get_seg_boundary accessor which is used in the *preceding* commits fb