RE: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
> On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:52 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > > > > On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher > > > > > wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > >> We discussed this during

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:52 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > > > On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher > > > > wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> We discussed this during NetConf last

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > > On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher > > > wrote: > > > [...] > > >> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct > that a > > >> custom sysfs interface is

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
> On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher > > wrote: > > [...] > >> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a > >> custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed > >> upon a generic

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Jeff Kirsher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher > wrote: > [...] >> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a >> custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this.

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote: [...] We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed upon a

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote: [...] We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a custom sysfs

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:52 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote: [...] We discussed this during NetConf

RE: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Hiroshi Shimamoto
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:52 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote: [...] We discussed this during

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control

2015-03-09 Thread Jeff Kirsher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote: [...] We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a custom sysfs interface is not the way we