Hi Antoniou
On 1/30/2013 7:25 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
On 1/30/2013 7:21 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Antoniou,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis
On 1/30/2013 7:25 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
On 1/30/2013 7:21 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Antoniou,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis Antoniou wro
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On 1/30/2013 7:21 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Vaibhav,
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Antoniou,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,
On 1/30/2013 7:21 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Antoniou,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:14:30, Pantelis A
Hi Vaibhav,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> Hi Antoniou,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Vaibhav,
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:14:30, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Vaibhav
Hi Antoniou,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:07:19, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Vaibhav,
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:14:30, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi Vaibhav,
> >>
> >> On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> >>
> >>>
Hi Vaibhav,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:14:30, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Vaibhav,
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 16:38:50, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> [...]
TBH I haven'
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:14:30, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Vaibhav,
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 16:38:50, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > [...]
> >>
> >> TBH I haven't found a simple way to print out the silicon revision number.
> >> Any
Hi Vaibhav,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 16:38:50, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> TBH I haven't found a simple way to print out the silicon revision number.
>> Anyone on the list know a quick and dirty method?
>>
>
> You can dump the DEV
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 16:38:50, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
[...]
>
> TBH I haven't found a simple way to print out the silicon revision number.
> Anyone on the list know a quick and dirty method?
>
You can dump the DEVICE_ID register @ 0x44e10600.
Bits 31:28 should be 0 for PG1.0 and 1 for PG2.
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On 1/30/2013 3:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/30/2013 2:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mugu
On 1/30/2013 3:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
On 1/30/2013 2:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
On 1/28/2013 6:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Fix interrupt storm on bone A
Hi,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On 1/30/2013 2:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Mugunthan,
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/28/2013 6:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book int
On 1/30/2013 2:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
On 1/28/2013 6:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book interrupt handling.
While at it, added a non-NAPI mode (which is easier to debu
Hi Mugunthan,
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On 1/28/2013 6:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book interrupt handling.
>> While at it, added a non-NAPI mode (which is easier to debug), plus
>> some general fixes.
>>
>> Sign
Hi Peter,
On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:14 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Pantelis" == Pantelis Antoniou writes:
>
> 'among other things' is not a very descriptive commit message.
>
> Pantelis> Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book
> Pantelis> interrupt handling. While at it, a
On 1/28/2013 6:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book interrupt handling.
While at it, added a non-NAPI mode (which is easier to debug), plus
some general fixes.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.tx
> "Pantelis" == Pantelis Antoniou writes:
'among other things' is not a very descriptive commit message.
Pantelis> Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book
Pantelis> interrupt handling. While at it, added a non-NAPI mode
Pantelis> (which is easier to debug), plus some gene
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:40:25PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
> Speaking of which, I'm probably the original developer of the fec driver.
BTW, as I mentioned, someone is converting fec to napi. Care to take a
look to make sure it is done right?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:40:25PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Yes, I guess this was more of a drive-by patch dump - but people need this
> to get PG2.0 silicon to work on am33xx.
And what is PG2.0?
> And no, I don't think having a non-NAPI code path is backwards, especiall
Hi Richard,
Yes, I guess this was more of a drive-by patch dump - but people need this
to get PG2.0 silicon to work on am33xx.
On Jan 28, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:11:08PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:11:08PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book interrupt handling.
> While at it, added a non-NAPI mode (which is easier to debug), plus
> some general fixes.
This patch does not apply to net-next.
When you do post to n
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:11:08PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Fix interrupt storm on bone A4 cause by non-by-the-book interrupt handling.
> While at it, added a non-NAPI mode (which is easier to debug), plus
> some general fixes.
I have a few issues with this patch:
1. This is a networking
23 matches
Mail list logo