On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:19:44, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
>
> > As far as lck clock node is concerned, we had deliberately dropped all leaf-
> > node clocks from the clock tree, please refer to the description mentioned
> > in -
> > http://lists.infrad
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> As far as lck clock node is concerned, we had deliberately dropped all leaf-
> node clocks from the clock tree, please refer to the description mentioned
> in -
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101987.html
Ach, shoul
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:56:40, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> + Vaibhav Hiremath
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > * Pantelis Antoniou [121030 11:04]:
> > > Looks like the lcdc clock definition got dropped.
> > > It is required for the LCD controller to work. Reintroduce.
> >
> > T
+ Vaibhav Hiremath
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pantelis Antoniou [121030 11:04]:
> > Looks like the lcdc clock definition got dropped.
> > It is required for the LCD controller to work. Reintroduce.
>
> This looks like a regression, can you also add the commit
> causing it?
L
* Pantelis Antoniou [121030 11:04]:
> Looks like the lcdc clock definition got dropped.
> It is required for the LCD controller to work. Reintroduce.
This looks like a regression, can you also add the commit
causing it?
Regards,
Tony
> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-
5 matches
Mail list logo