RE: [PATCH 1/3] clk: imx8mq: initialize clock tree earlier

baylibre.com; > sb...@kernel.org; Abel Vesa ; ccai...@baylibre.com; > a...@sigxcpu.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > c...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: dl-linux-imx > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] clk: imx8mq: initiali

RE: [PATCH 1/3] clk: imx8mq: initialize clock tree earlier

feste...@gmail.com; mturque...@baylibre.com; > sb...@kernel.org; Abel Vesa ; ccai...@baylibre.com; > a...@sigxcpu.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > c...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: dl-linux-imx > Subject: Re:

Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: imx8mq: initialize clock tree earlier

Am Freitag, den 22.02.2019, 09:42 + schrieb Anson Huang: > Currently on i.MX8MQ platform, clock driver is probed > later than GPIO driver, and GPIO driver does NOT have > defer probe mechanism since the GPIO clock is optional, So this is what should be fixed. If there is a clock reference in t

RE: [PATCH 1/3] clk: imx8mq: initialize clock tree earlier

Hi Anson, > From: Anson Huang > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 5:42 PM > > Currently on i.MX8MQ platform, clock driver is probed later than GPIO driver, > and GPIO driver does NOT have defer probe mechanism since the GPIO clock is > optional, some platforms have GPIO clocks and some are NOT. So