On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Gross, Mark wrote:
> So if you have the luxury of being able to influence (file bugs against or
> write)
> the platform enumeration ABI then with ACPI you can have a named gpio today.
> Note: there is an expectation that the _PRP feature to go into the next
> ve
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 02:13 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> So it is basically there to satisfy the habit in some device
>> tree bindings to name gpio arrays instead of just passing gpios = <...>;
>> (The latter should be encouraged going forward.)
>
>
yland
> >> Klein; linux-wireless; netdev; linux-kernel; Arnd Bergmann; Gross, Mark
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio names
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Stephen Warren
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 02/20/2014 06:55
To: Stephen Warren; Alexandre Courbot; Grant Likely;
>> devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai; Heikki Krogerus; Johannes Berg; David S. Miller; Rhyland
>> Klein; linux-wireless; netdev; linux-kernel; Arnd Bergmann; Gross, Mark
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: rfkill: g
en-Yu Tsai; Heikki Krogerus; Johannes Berg; David S. Miller; Rhyland
> Klein; linux-wireless; netdev; linux-kernel; Arnd Bergmann; Gross, Mark
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio names
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Stephen Warren
> wrote:
> > On
On 02/25/2014 02:13 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 02/20/2014 06:55 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
>>> That's correct. However using con_id to pass this results in different
>>> behavior across DT and ACPI. A better way is to export the labeling
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/20/2014 06:55 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> That's correct. However using con_id to pass this results in different
>> behavior across DT and ACPI. A better way is to export the labeling
>> function so consumers can set meaningful labels
On 02/20/2014 06:55 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Stephen Warren
> wrote:
>> On 02/20/2014 05:51 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>> There is no use for them in this driver. This will fix a
>>> static checker warning..
>>
>> Didn't you remove the use:
>>
>> -
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/20/2014 05:51 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>> There is no use for them in this driver. This will fix a
>> static checker warning..
>
> Didn't you remove the use:
>
> - gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, rfkill->reset_nam
On 02/20/2014 05:51 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> There is no use for them in this driver. This will fix a
> static checker warning..
Didn't you remove the use:
- gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, rfkill->reset_name, 0);
+ gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, 0);
doesn'
10 matches
Mail list logo
