On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:54:03PM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> Yes, Zheng's patches are exact same patches as you already had. I only
> remove 11, 13,16, 17 from previous patch set and add your new patch (no
> change).
OK thanks for confirming, I didn't find any changes, but that could
equally
>
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:54:17AM -0500, Kan Liang wrote:
> > Yan, Zheng (13):
> > perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size
> > perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback
> > perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack
> > perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:54:17AM -0500, Kan Liang wrote:
> Yan, Zheng (13):
> perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size
> perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback
> perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack
> perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support
> perf,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:54:17AM -0500, Kan Liang wrote:
Yan, Zheng (13):
perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size
perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback
perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack
perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support
perf, core: pmu
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:54:17AM -0500, Kan Liang wrote:
Yan, Zheng (13):
perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size
perf, core: introduce pmu context switch callback
perf, x86: use context switch callback to flush LBR stack
perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:54:03PM +, Liang, Kan wrote:
Yes, Zheng's patches are exact same patches as you already had. I only
remove 11, 13,16, 17 from previous patch set and add your new patch (no
change).
OK thanks for confirming, I didn't find any changes, but that could
equally be
6 matches
Mail list logo