Re: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-15 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 12/15/2020 19:20, Limonciello, Mario wrote: Absolutely - I'll ask them to look into this again. we need to explain why on Windows systems required 1s and on Linux systems up to 2.5s - otherwise it is not reliable approach - you will encounter others buggy system. (ME not POR on the Linux s

RE: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-15 Thread Limonciello, Mario
> > Absolutely - I'll ask them to look into this again. > > > we need to explain why on Windows systems required 1s and on Linux > systems up to 2.5s - otherwise it is not reliable approach - you will > encounter others buggy system. > (ME not POR on the Linux systems - is only one possible answer

Re: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-15 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 12/14/2020 20:40, Mark Pearson wrote: Thanks Hans On 14/12/2020 13:31, Mark Pearson wrote: *From:* Hans de Goede *Sent:* December 14, 2020 13:24 *To:* Mario Limonciello ; Jeff Kirsher ; Tony Nguyen ; intel-wired-...@

Re: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-14 Thread Mark Pearson
Thanks Hans On 14/12/2020 13:31, Mark Pearson wrote: > > > > *From:* Hans de Goede > *Sent:* December 14, 2020 13:24 > *To:* Mario Limonciello ; Jeff Kirsher > ; Tony Nguyen ; > intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org ; > David M