On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:02:29AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> If you want to apply this one first, that's fine by me.
Thanks, I'll route it through the EDAC tree.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 14:58 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:17:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. I don't have a box to test, so I can't take on this driver. But
> > leaving
> > it in tree for a while longer doesn't hurt (much ... it seems to get a
> > tree
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:17:50PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Agreed. I don't have a box to test, so I can't take on this driver. But
> leaving
> it in tree for a while longer doesn't hurt (much ... it seems to get a
> tree-wide
> cleanup patch about once a year ... which doesn't sound like a cr
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 17:19 +0200, Anders Larsen wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2016-08-24 16:33 Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> > sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> > obsolete or unmaintained.
> Whereas I agree it's helpful to pu
On Wednesday, 2016-08-24 16:33 Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
Whereas I agree it's helpful to purge dysfunctional adresses...
> These M: entries in MAINTAINER
On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 22:31 -0400, Mark F. Brown wrote:
> I've continued to author patches for the Linux kernel, but they have been
> under my work email address. This email works but I do not monitor it very
> often anymore.
So should the MAINTAINERS address be changed ?
>> Maybe mark it Obsolete or Orphan.
>
> Yap, let's mark it Orphan and remove Jason Uhlenkott's email address. I
> wouldn't go as far as removing it just yet especially if it doesn't cost
> us anything to have it in there and someone might have a box with the
> hardware somewhere...
Agreed. I don
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:50:12PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Maybe mark it Obsolete or Orphan.
Yap, let's mark it Orphan and remove Jason Uhlenkott's email address. I
wouldn't go as far as removing it just yet especially if it doesn't cost
us anything to have it in there and someone might have a
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 15:34 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 07:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many sections in
> > MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either obsolete or unmaintained.
> ...
> > juhle...@akamai.com
> So I can confirm
On 08/24/2016 07:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
sections in
MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
obsolete or unmaintained.
...
juhle...@akamai.com
Hi Joe,
So I can confirm that he is no longer here, and as far
as I know is not in
On 08/24/2016 04:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections would make MAINTAINERS and ge
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 09:56 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 04:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> > sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> > obsolete or unmaintained.
> >
> > Marking these sections app
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections would make MAINTAINE
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 16:58 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:33:45PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> > sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> > obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> > secur...@kernel.org
> Yo
We can change mine from sfre...@samba.org to smbfre...@gmail.com since
Samba.org email is more awkward to get that gmail these days (I read it
less often) and I use a non-Samba.org email for my commits.
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:33:45PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
> secur...@kernel.org
You are kidding, right?
>
> The email addresses below are also bcc'd here to see what bounces.
> The list of the bounces will be collected.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> aacr...@adaptec.com
> aacr...@microsemi.com
Hi Joe,
aacr...@microsemi.com is a mailing list, and is valid. I thought I had changed
aacr...@adaptec.com, but mus
Hi Joe,
Em Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:33:45 -0700
Joe Perches escreveu:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections woul
Hi Joe,
I would suggest that those addresses which bounce should certainly be
removed, but the rest should be left alone.
Kind regards,
Tigran
PS. Joe, sorry if you received this message twice --- my first attempt
to reply failed because gmail used html by default :)
On 25 August 2016 at 00:33,
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 11:00 +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> I would suggest that those addresses which bounce should certainly be
> removed, but the rest should be left alone.
That's the plan.
Here's the current bounce list:
andrew.d.henr...@intel.com
brucech...@via.com.tw
dmitry.tarnya...@lockl
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 21:02 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> I get these emails, but have not received any patches worth acking in 3+
> years. Obviously, the code I am ostensibly maintaining has proven to be
> absolutely perfect in every way :-)
Hey Linas
I guess you could change the S: status line
Hi Joe,
The address "support.opensou...@diasemi.com" works. Thanks.
On 25 August 2016 00:34 Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
[...]
> The email addresses below a
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 17:17 -0700, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Petr.
> I (p...@vandrovec.name) am "maintainer" of ncpfs. As NetWare is dead for
> decade or so, there are no new users, and so no new bugs are found, and no
> new features needs to be added. And so no checkins are needed.
No wor
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:33:45 -0700
Joe Perches wrote:
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
> ali...@web.de
Hi Joe!
Been using this email address as my main address for nearly 17 year
> Am 24.08.2016 um 19:33 schrieb Joe Perches :
>
> Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many
> sections in
> MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either
> obsolete or unmaintained.
>
> Marking these sections appropriately or simply removing the
> sections would make MAINTAINE
25 matches
Mail list logo
