hayeswang :
[...]
> Sorry for my unclear descriptor. I just think a case that the nic suspends or
> shutdowns without cable plugging. Then, the cable is plugged again. If the nic
> speed down to 10M and the link partner force 100M, the issue appears again. If
> the nic doesn't speed down for
hayeswang hayesw...@realtek.com :
[...]
Sorry for my unclear descriptor. I just think a case that the nic suspends or
shutdowns without cable plugging. Then, the cable is plugged again. If the nic
speed down to 10M and the link partner force 100M, the issue appears again. If
the nic doesn't
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:21 PM
> To: Hayeswang
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> bowgot...@google.com; Ryankao
> Subject: Re: r8169 auto speed down issue
>
[...]
>
> I don't get your po
hayeswang :
> Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com]
> [...]
> > Your description suggests that testing against the link
> > partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for
^^ -> "and"
> > tp->link_ok could be good enough.
As a policy we
hayeswang hayesw...@realtek.com :
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com]
[...]
Your description suggests that testing against the link
partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for
^^ - and
tp-link_ok could be good enough.
As a
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:21 PM
To: Hayeswang
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
bowgot...@google.com; Ryankao
Subject: Re: r8169 auto speed down issue
[...]
I don't get your point. Can you reformulate ?
Sorry
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com]
[...]
> Your description suggests that testing against the link
> partner ability
> to work at 10M instead of testing for tp->link_ok could be
> good enough.
>
> Does it make sense ?
>
Furthermore, should it not speed down without linking, even
hayeswang :
[...]
> Do you have any suggestion about this?
Your description suggests that testing against the link partner ability
to work at 10M instead of testing for tp->link_ok could be good enough.
Does it make sense ?
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
hayeswang hayesw...@realtek.com :
[...]
Do you have any suggestion about this?
Your description suggests that testing against the link partner ability
to work at 10M instead of testing for tp-link_ok could be good enough.
Does it make sense ?
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com]
[...]
Your description suggests that testing against the link
partner ability
to work at 10M instead of testing for tp-link_ok could be
good enough.
Does it make sense ?
Furthermore, should it not speed down without linking, even though
10 matches
Mail list logo