Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-30 Thread Francois Romieu
hayeswang : [...] > Sorry for my unclear descriptor. I just think a case that the nic suspends or > shutdowns without cable plugging. Then, the cable is plugged again. If the nic > speed down to 10M and the link partner force 100M, the issue appears again. If > the nic doesn't speed down for

Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-30 Thread Francois Romieu
hayeswang hayesw...@realtek.com : [...] Sorry for my unclear descriptor. I just think a case that the nic suspends or shutdowns without cable plugging. Then, the cable is plugged again. If the nic speed down to 10M and the link partner force 100M, the issue appears again. If the nic doesn't

RE: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-29 Thread hayeswang
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:21 PM > To: Hayeswang > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > bowgot...@google.com; Ryankao > Subject: Re: r8169 auto speed down issue > [...] > > I don't get your po

Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-29 Thread Francois Romieu
hayeswang : > Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com] > [...] > > Your description suggests that testing against the link > > partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for ^^ -> "and" > > tp->link_ok could be good enough. As a policy we

Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-29 Thread Francois Romieu
hayeswang hayesw...@realtek.com : Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com] [...] Your description suggests that testing against the link partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for ^^ - and tp-link_ok could be good enough. As a

RE: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-29 Thread hayeswang
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:21 PM To: Hayeswang Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; bowgot...@google.com; Ryankao Subject: Re: r8169 auto speed down issue [...] I don't get your point. Can you reformulate ? Sorry

RE: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-28 Thread hayeswang
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com] [...] > Your description suggests that testing against the link > partner ability > to work at 10M instead of testing for tp->link_ok could be > good enough. > > Does it make sense ? > Furthermore, should it not speed down without linking, even

Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-28 Thread Francois Romieu
hayeswang : [...] > Do you have any suggestion about this? Your description suggests that testing against the link partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for tp->link_ok could be good enough. Does it make sense ? -- Ueimor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-28 Thread Francois Romieu
hayeswang hayesw...@realtek.com : [...] Do you have any suggestion about this? Your description suggests that testing against the link partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for tp-link_ok could be good enough. Does it make sense ? -- Ueimor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

RE: r8169 auto speed down issue

2013-03-28 Thread hayeswang
Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com] [...] Your description suggests that testing against the link partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for tp-link_ok could be good enough. Does it make sense ? Furthermore, should it not speed down without linking, even though