On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:34:18PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
> diff -Nuar linux-2.6.11.org/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_neo.c
> linux-2.6.11.new/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_neo.c
> --- linux-2.6.11.org/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_neo.c 1969-12-31
> 18:00:00.0 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6.11.new/drivers/serial
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Jeff pointed out several PCI posting errors last time. Before we used
udelay and now we changed to readb/readl instead of udelay this time.
But we only used PCI posting when we think maybe delay there.
So we have to do PCI posting on every writeb?
not every
Do you
> Jeff pointed out several PCI posting errors last time. Before we used
> udelay and now we changed to readb/readl instead of udelay this time.
> But we only used PCI posting when we think maybe delay there.
> So we have to do PCI posting on every writeb?
not every
> Do you have some rules for
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 10:38 -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+static void neo_set_cts_flow_control(struct jsm_channel *ch)
+{
+ u8 ier = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->ier);
+ u8 efr = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
+
...
+
+ writeb(ier, &ch->ch_neo_uart->ier);
+}
Hi,
have y
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 10:38 -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
> +static void neo_set_cts_flow_control(struct jsm_channel *ch)
> +{
> + u8 ier = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->ier);
> + u8 efr = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
> +
...
> +
> + writeb(ier, &ch->ch_neo_uart->ier);
> +}
Hi,
have you ever a
The third patch for jsm device driver.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nuar linux-2.6.11.org/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_neo.c
linux-2.6.11.new/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_neo.c
--- linux-2.6.11.org/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_neo.c 1969-12-31
18:00:00.0 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.11.n
6 matches
Mail list logo
