> > >How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
> > >another over the network? Think of the uptime!
> > >
> >
> > It is here. Look at Mosix.
>
> No. Not for uptime.
>
> The "responsibility" for process completion does not get delegated. A process
> will always
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:06:42AM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
> Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
>
> >Hey, this is cool.
> >
> >How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
> >another over the network? Think of the uptime!
> >
>
> It is here. Look at Mosix.
No. Not for
Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
>Hey, this is cool.
>
>How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
>another over the network? Think of the uptime!
>
It is here. Look at Mosix.
--
I'd rather listen to Newton than to Mundie [MS flunkie who made a speech on
the evil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> How do you relocate
> -- pages which are mlocked without violating RT contraints?
> -- pages which contain kernel pointers and might be accessed from
> interrupt context?
Those two are the same problem, essentially. You have to copy the page,
then map it int
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
> > Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
>
> How do you hotswap RAM? What happens to the data that was on the
> removed memory module?
Dont know about the s390 - but on so
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:15:53AM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> Hey, this is cool.
>
> How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
> another over the network? Think of the uptime!
http://www.mosix.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
> Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
How do you hotswap RAM? What happens to the data that was on the
removed memory module?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hey, this is cool.
How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:19:09PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> This only leaves two issues, the first is device drivers and the
> second is the question whether we'd want the overhead needed to
> implement the (fairly easy) memory relocat
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:34:16AM -0500, Mitch Adair wrote:
>
> Wouldn't that be lot of the same issues as a "swapoff" with some
> portion of that in use? (except for the kernel data case of
> course...)
>
> No. Swapoff makes pages alloca
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Mitch Adair wrote:
> Wouldn't that be lot of the same issues as a "swapoff" with some
> portion of that in use? (except for the kernel data case of
> course...)
Basically, yes.
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly n
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
>
> Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
> existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find som
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
>
> Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
> existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way of
> finding all
> Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
> existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way of
> finding all the pages that are in use and then dealing with them
> appropriately, and when some are locked or contain kernel data this
> would be extremely difficu
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support? Especially with
systems with Chipkill coming out, this would be great to support...
- Pete
Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can find a new version of the hot swap cpu patch at:
>
> http://samba.org/~anton/patches/cpu_hotswap-2.4.3-pa
15 matches
Mail list logo
