On Sun, 20 May 2007, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > i can do that as long as there's no way that those changes can
> > (even theoretically) make a difference in the build. in order to
> > make sure this patch didn't break anything, i went with a straigh
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i can do that as long as there's no way that those changes can (even
> theoretically) make a difference in the build. in order to make sure
> this patch didn't break anything, i went with a straight cut-and-paste
> of the content to go into the new m
On Sun, 20 May 2007, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleinfo.h b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..cee86a9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > +
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/moduleinfo.h b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..cee86a9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
> +#define _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
>
4 matches
Mail list logo