Re: [PATCH 0/3] clkdev: add devm_get_clk_from_child()

2016-12-15 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Mark > > Mark, I think I should re-post 2nd patch (3rd will be dropped) after > > merge window ? There will be no branch dependency > > Should be fine without but obviously if it looks like it's gone AWOL > then reposting would be good. OK, Thanks !

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clkdev: add devm_get_clk_from_child()

2016-12-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 12:25:48AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Mark, I think I should re-post 2nd patch (3rd will be dropped) after > merge window ? There will be no branch dependency Should be fine without but obviously if it looks like it's gone AWOL then reposting would be good. signat

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clkdev: add devm_get_clk_from_child()

2016-12-08 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Stephen, Mark > > This is v5 of "clkdev: add devm_of_clk_get()", but new series. > > I hope my understanding was correct with your idea. > > Yes this looks good. Given that we're so close to the merge > window, perhaps I should just merge the first patch into clk-next > and then it will be re

Re: [PATCH 0/3] clkdev: add devm_get_clk_from_child()

2016-12-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/05, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Stephen > > This is v5 of "clkdev: add devm_of_clk_get()", but new series. > I hope my understanding was correct with your idea. Yes this looks good. Given that we're so close to the merge window, perhaps I should just merge the first patch into clk-next