Re: [PATCH 02/12] trace: Make trace_hwlat timestamp y2038 safe

2017-04-07 Thread Deepa Dinamani
>> - trace_seq_printf(s, "#%-5u inner/outer(us): %4llu/%-5llu ts:%ld.%09ld", >> + trace_seq_printf(s, "#%-5u inner/outer(us): %4llu/%-5llu >> ts:%lld.%09ld", >>field->seqnum, >>field->duration, >>

Re: [PATCH 02/12] trace: Make trace_hwlat timestamp y2038 safe

2017-04-07 Thread Deepa Dinamani
>> - trace_seq_printf(s, "#%-5u inner/outer(us): %4llu/%-5llu ts:%ld.%09ld", >> + trace_seq_printf(s, "#%-5u inner/outer(us): %4llu/%-5llu >> ts:%lld.%09ld", >>field->seqnum, >>field->duration, >>

Re: [PATCH 02/12] trace: Make trace_hwlat timestamp y2038 safe

2017-04-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:57:00 -0700 Deepa Dinamani wrote: > struct timespec is not y2038 safe on 32 bit machines > and needs to be replaced by struct timespec64 > in order to represent times beyond year 2038 on such > machines. > > Fix all the timestamp representation in

Re: [PATCH 02/12] trace: Make trace_hwlat timestamp y2038 safe

2017-04-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:57:00 -0700 Deepa Dinamani wrote: > struct timespec is not y2038 safe on 32 bit machines > and needs to be replaced by struct timespec64 > in order to represent times beyond year 2038 on such > machines. > > Fix all the timestamp representation in struct trace_hwlat > and